frenck / python-open-meteo

Asynchronous client for the Open-Meteo API.
MIT License
23 stars 5 forks source link

⬆️ Update dependency pytest-asyncio to v0.24.0 #727

Closed renovate[bot] closed 1 week ago

renovate[bot] commented 1 month ago

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
pytest-asyncio (changelog) 0.23.8 -> 0.24.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

pytest-dev/pytest-asyncio (pytest-asyncio) ### [`v0.24.0`](https://togithub.com/pytest-dev/pytest-asyncio/releases/tag/v0.24.0): pytest-asyncio 0.24.0 [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/pytest-dev/pytest-asyncio/compare/v0.23.8...v0.24.0) ##### 0.24.0 (2024-08-22) - BREAKING: Updated minimum supported pytest version to v8.2.0 - Adds an optional *loop_scope* keyword argument to *pytest.mark.asyncio*. This argument controls which event loop is used to run the marked async test. [#​706](https://togithub.com/pytest-dev/pytest-asyncio/issues/706), [#​871](https://togithub.com/pytest-dev/pytest-asyncio/pull/871) - Deprecates the optional *scope* keyword argument to *pytest.mark.asyncio* for API consistency with `pytest_asyncio.fixture`. Users are encouraged to use the *loop_scope* keyword argument, which does exactly the same. - Raises an error when passing *scope* or *loop_scope* as a positional argument to `@pytest.mark.asyncio`. [#​812](https://togithub.com/pytest-dev/pytest-asyncio/issues/812) - Fixes a bug that caused module-scoped async fixtures to fail when reused in other modules [#​862](https://togithub.com/pytest-dev/pytest-asyncio/issues/862) [#​668](https://togithub.com/pytest-dev/pytest-asyncio/issues/668)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.



This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 week ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud