Open david-natingga-frequenz opened 5 months ago
Once the following issue is resolved https://github.com/frequenz-floss/frequenz-api-common/discussions/215 we should adhere to the naming standards agreed on there.
No response
This concerns renaming the field names in the classes in _types.
What's needed?
Once the following issue is resolved https://github.com/frequenz-floss/frequenz-api-common/discussions/215 we should adhere to the naming standards agreed on there.
Proposed solution
No response
Use cases
No response
Alternatives and workarounds
No response
Additional context
This concerns renaming the field names in the classes in _types.