Closed rufuspollock closed 6 years ago
Ruby implementations has Package
. But for DataPackage
and Resource
I suppose there are historical reasons (it was named like this for a while)
cc @pwalsh @akariv @amercader
I'd vote for Package and Resource.
It is just historical. Data Resource
only really became a fully formed concept in recent months. I think we should be consistent Package
/ Resource
or DataPackage
/ DataResource
, but I am not opinionated on which one. Whatever @roll decides.
Package
and Resource
sounds great. It was a little bit confusing to have datapackage
module, DataPackage
class and data_package
(explicit dp
) instance in documentation.
@roll I agree!
As class names shouldn't we have
EITHER Package and Resource
OR DataPackage and DataResource
At the moment we DataPackage and Resource.