Closed roll closed 3 months ago
I'd be interested to join the working group
@pwalsh Amazing to see you joining! I added you to the WG team
@roll I'd also be happy to be part of the group. Thanks!
@akariv Amazing! Added you to the team
I'd like to contribute to cleanup of Table Schema specification.
Hi @nichtich,
Would you like to join the Working Group?
Dear @frictionlessdata/data-package-working-group
Today's update is tiny as we didn't manage to start working on the specs issues in December but we will in January. So the only news is that Contribution Guide has been released - https://github.com/frictionlessdata/specs/issues/857
@roll wrote:
Would you like to join the Working Group?
Yet, please!
I'd like to join the working group, please. :slightly_smiling_face:
The intake project is interesting in watching this and contributing, please include me.
Dear @frictionlessdata/data-package-working-group,
Here is the first update of the new version of the standard work. Please take your time voting and reviewing the proposals as it's meant to be at the comfortable pace for everyone (cc @sapetti9).
Please vote on the following pull requests by using a π (yes), π (no), or :eyes: (neutral) reaction or a comment. Please suggest changes if you think that the pull request needs to be updated
Please review, comment or participate in duscussions
wontfix
- https://github.com/frictionlessdata/specs/issues/379wontfix
- https://github.com/frictionlessdata/specs/issues/621wontfix
- https://github.com/frictionlessdata/specs/issues/802Minor changes just for your information
version
property in the package profile - https://github.com/frictionlessdata/specs/issues/631 duration
constraints - https://github.com/frictionlessdata/specs/issues/528geopoint
wording - https://github.com/frictionlessdata/specs/issues/655Here are linkable categories:
PS. Sorry for the long message, it was a first iteration I tried to cover as mush as possible "small changes" to free up the time for more important things in the future updates
@roll, maybe it's just me, but for reviewing (future) proposals, I'd want to use an emoji to indicate neutral support (in addition to π and π). Unfortunately GitHub only offers a limited option, maybe π can be used to indicate "seen it, don't have a strong opinion"?
@peterdesmet No, it's not only you as it's the same at least for me :smile:. I think :eyes: is a great suggestion -- let's use it!
PS. I updated the wording for proposals "Please vote on the following pull requests by using a π (yes), π (no), or :eyes: (neutral) reaction or a comment. Please suggest changes if you think that the pull request needs to be updated" (also adding regarding proposing changes)
Dear @frictionlessdata/data-package-working-group,
First of all, I want to thank all of you for participating in the discussions! It's really amazing to see so many great and insightful people dedicating their own time to the work on the standard. I think we're making great progress! Unfortunately, I'm away till the next week, so I'm going to join the discussion when I'm back, as well as preparing new proposals.
:clap:
Could you add me to the list? I didn't get an invite to the community call and can't make it. I would love to be there next time!
Hi @PietrH I added your @inbo address to the mailing list, and will invite you to the calls from now on. I would also encourage you to join the community chat if you haven't yet.
Dear @frictionlessdata/data-package-working-group,
Here is an update of the new version of the standard work. Please take your time voting and reviewing the proposals as it's meant to be at the comfortable pace for everyone.
Dear @frictionlessdata/data-package-working-group,
Here is an update of the new version of the standard work. Please take your time voting and reviewing the proposals as it's meant to be at the comfortable pace for everyone.
If you have some time, please take a look at some pull requests that are still both not accepted and not rejected (link with oldest PRs first). Note, that currently we need 7 votes yes
to accept the change otherwise we will have to close a PR before the release. Next week, I'm going to work on the requested changes as well to update the PRs that are supported in-principle but require some implementation updates
Dear @frictionlessdata/data-package,
Based on the first month's work experience, we added an additional tier to the Working Group structure -- the advisory group. Obviously, participating in the weekly-votings is time-consuming, and it will be great to have the ability to have more great people in the working group but without asking them to actively vote. As the decision-making system is based on the quorum concept we really need to have only active members in the voting category so let's discuss an exact mechanism of how people can change their WG tier on this week community call :rocket:
Currently, the structure is as below (note that @nichtich's and @ezwelty's invite to the voting group is pending), making it 9 voting group members and 6 votes for a quorum (updated). Please let me know if you'd like to change your tier on GitHub or on the community call! As mentioned before the veto
group is reserved for core Data Package implementation representatives. Also, we already added the first version of the governance document to the website which is now are ready for comments - https://datapackage.org/standard/governance/
@roll I'd be interested in being part of the working group (with the power to vote, I suppose?). I've already gone rogue and voted sporadically on some of the proposed issues.
Note that the link to the working group members (in the original post of this thread, and at https://datapackage.org/standard/governance/) is broken: https://github.com/orgs/frictionlessdata/teams/data-package-working-group/members?query=
@ezwelty Amazing! It will be great to have you! I've sent the invite and fixed the link
@roll could you also please resend my invite? I seem to have missed it.
Dear @frictionlessdata/data-package,
Thanks for a productive week towards Data Package (v2) and a great community call! Here is a traditional weekly update:
You can track a live version using this link
Dear @frictionlessdata/data-package,
Thanks for the finished Data Package (v2) draft release!
Dear @frictionlessdata/data-package,
Here is a weekly update for the Data Package (v2) work. We now have proposals for almost all the outstanding issues; please take a look at them. On this month's community call, we will have time to discuss everything we need regarding the last chunk of possible changes.
Dear @frictionlessdata/data-package,
Here is an end-of-April update of the Data Package (v2) work.
The last bits of changes we're discussing for v2:
A new CKAN extension - https://github.com/frictionlessdata/ckanext-datapackage - focuses only on one thing (Data API) and hopefully does it well (similarly to ckanext-dcat
).
Thanks, everyone! The Data Package (v2) is going to be released today! We will post the update in the announcement issue https://github.com/frictionlessdata/datapackage/issues/854 to notify all the contributors.
Itβs a live tracker of the Frictionless Standards (v2) work. All the new change proposals will be posted here on a weekly basis. The Data Package Working Group members will be notified of every update (please manage your issue subscription options if you want to unsubscribe from emails)