Open danfowler opened 8 years ago
From @rgrp on June 8, 2014 14:11
@peterdesmet have a question here that i'd welcome your input on. In preparing the tutorial should we say:
From @peterdesmet on June 10, 2014 15:12
I would choose the latter (few types) for several reasons:
So I would focus on geojson
and topojson
, as these are well-defined, open and geospatial. I'm not familiar with geocsv
, but if these can be covered as tabular data packages, I would just reference that specification. Regarding sqlite
: not familiar either, but maybe a specific data package for these (not necessarily geo) could be useful.
My 2 cents.
From @rgrp on August 14, 2014 8:56
@peterdesmet I agree about few types (and only one perhaps). I've even start some work in this direction (focus on geojson maybe in first instance). Would welcome your help!
From @peterdesmet on August 14, 2014 15:49
@rgrp where does this documentation/tutorial live (here?). What should the documentation/tutorial include (do you have an existing example)?
From @rgrp on August 14, 2014 15:56
@peterdesmet that's where it lives http://data.okfn.org/doc/publish-geo
Re what it could look like we could follow http://data.okfn.org/publish (i don't think it matters than we repeat stuff).
From @rgrp on October 16, 2014 10:3
@peterdesmet any thoughts on what we could / should improve here: http://data.okfn.org/doc/publish-geo ?
From @peterdesmet on November 11, 2014 19:12
@rgrp Sorry, caught up in a lot of work the last few months. Will take some time until I can get back to this.
From @rgrp on February 16, 2015 8:44
@peterdesmet any more time?
From @rgrp on November 24, 2013 17:40
Basics are easy here.
Real question is whether there is a recommendation on data types. Main options afaict:
Copied from original issue: frictionlessdata/project#90