Closed hackerscomputer closed 3 years ago
Strange. I tested the header you provided, but the rule does not seem to show up. There has to be something else in the header causing the wrong rule.
ok, i think becouse i'm manually install version 1.1.2 from mailscanner language branch ( v 1.1.2 ). now i update it to 1.1.4 and works ok, thanks
Thanks for the explanation. I'm glad that everything works now.
hello find wrong score report in some mailscanner email, like this one with header attached below report wrong rule 47 with score 12.... seem get it form
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
?X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - xxxxxxxxxx.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - xxxxxxxxxx.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - xxxxxxxxxx.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: xxxxxxxxxx.com: authenticated_id: xxxxxxxxxx.com X-Authenticated-Sender: xxxxxxxxxx.com: xxxxxxxxxx.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-ID: 1kkRY0-0002YS-Fx X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-From: xxxxxxxxxx.com X-Server3-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Server3-MailScanner-ID: 1kkRYg-0003QP-9c X-Server3-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Server3-MailScanner-SpamCheck: non spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, punteggio=3.702, necessario 6, BAYES_50 0.80, DKIM_SIGNED 0.10, DKIM_VALID -0.10, DKIM_VALID_AU -0.10, DKIM_VALID_EF -0.10, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_04 0.00, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00, KAM_SHORT 0.00, PYZOR_CHECK 0.70, SPF_PASS -0.00, ZZ_COUNTRY_WHITE 0.50, ZZ_RBL_BARRACU 1.90) X-Server3-MailScanner-SpamScore: sss X-Server3-MailScanner-From: xxxxxxxxxx.com