Hi, I think I've encountered a bug in the calculation of supporting read counts and VAFs for inversions (and probably other rearrangments?).
Inversions have 2 distinct breakpoints, and are supported by reads in both the +/+ and -/- orientations. The number of supporting variant reads VR in the final output is only the count of reads in the +/+ orientation, but the TR (the denominator in the VAF calculation) is the sum of the depths at both breakpoints, making the final VAF approximately 1/2 of the correct value.
Hi, I think I've encountered a bug in the calculation of supporting read counts and VAFs for inversions (and probably other rearrangments?).
Inversions have 2 distinct breakpoints, and are supported by reads in both the +/+ and -/- orientations. The number of supporting variant reads VR in the final output is only the count of reads in the +/+ orientation, but the TR (the denominator in the VAF calculation) is the sum of the depths at both breakpoints, making the final VAF approximately 1/2 of the correct value.