Closed kilianc closed 6 months ago
Hey @kilianc,
Do you mean something like what's described in #31? See the discussion started there, and even the work another community folk started.
Perhaps a good opportunity for you to contribute? 😛 Or, at least, to help defining such feature 🙇🏻
I looked at #68 and the code looks fine, is there a problem with that code change if proposed again? (other than a rebase)
I looked at #68 and the code looks fine, is there a problem with that code change if proposed again? (other than a rebase)
I think that code was not only missing a rebase but also had some tests failing, was arguably adding a breaking change, and the approach was probably a bit poor (you was only allowed to set different bodies, not different full responses).
What do you think about #167? Would that be enough for what you're looking for?
Take a look at the TestImposterHandler_MultipleRequests
test (both cases), please.
Thanks! 🙇🏻
It would be very nice to pass in an array of responses to use in the imposter to control the order and kind of payload in a e2e test suite.