Open eloo-abi opened 3 months ago
Hey @eloo-abi! Thanks for your contribution 💟 However, before moving forward, I'd like to see some tests that show the expected behavior in different scenarios (e.g. no variables at all, a variable with a single value, a variable with multiple values, multiple variables, when a non-defined variable is used, etc).
Hi,
no variables at all
this is covered by the existing tests already as the implementation is not going to change anything here
a variable with a single value
will be added
a variable with multiple values
not sure what this is, can you give an example of a variable with multiple values?
multiple variables
will be added
when a non-defined variable is used
it behaves like a wrong manually entered path as the implementation is not doing anything special, just adjust the path to search for a file
Hi,
no variables at all
this is covered by the existing tests already as the implementation is not going to change anything here
a variable with a single value
will be added
a variable with multiple values
not sure what this is, can you give an example of a variable with multiple values?
multiple variables
will be added
when a non-defined variable is used
it behaves like a wrong manually entered path as the implementation is not doing anything special, just adjust the path to search for a file
Yes, please, ignore the case of multiple values for a single variable (I left a comment in the issue). Cover the rest, and we can go! 🚀
tests added
i was not sure where or how to add to i have added it similar to other handler_tests
i hope this makes sense
@joanlopez hi, any news near? if everything fits your needs maybe we can merge this?
thanks
@joanlopez hi, any news near? if everything fits your needs maybe we can merge this?
thanks
Hey @eloo-abi! Sorry for the delay, I've been quite busy during recent weeks. I left some comments and suggestions, I think that, once fixed, it will be good enough to be merged, for me.
Thanks! 🙇🏻
@joanlopez everything should be addressed :)
@joanlopez did you have already time to have a look?
@joanlopez did you have already time to have a look?
Been AFK for some time during September, but planning to review it during October for sure! 🙇🏻
@joanlopez if its not a blocker please merge this PR as it takes already a very long time for such a small change
@joanlopez if its not a blocker please merge this PR as it takes already a very long time for such a small change
Yeah, sure! I'm waiting for @aperezg to give his 👍🏻, which I hope we get in the next few days, it's alright from my side! 🙇🏻
Hi, this PR enables the usage of the variables defined in the imposters to be reused in the bodyFile path. So we can use "dynamic" responses for different paths easily. Fixes: #175