Closed Libermentix closed 1 year ago
Is there a preferred version? IPC-D-356A has been superseded by IPC-D-356B https://www.ipc.org/TOC/IPC-D-356B.pdf
@KjellMorgenstern IPC-D-356B is preferred
I think we would not implement the full standard. Basically, rectangular pads and circles should cover nearly all cases.
Because it was mentioned in the Forum: Before we can tackle pick and place / assembly, we need to establish MPNs and MNs. This issue is limited to PCB testing infrastructure.
Assembly can be tackled with this. Just Auto-Assign won't work, but that's okay to do for the user.
IPC export works with 1.0.0
This should be helpful for evaluating PCBs, both for automatic checks, but also for manual reviews or even 3rd party renderers:
Problem
Fritzing is a great tool for designing PCBs. Yet, it currently does not support the Export of IPC-netlist files. Hence AISLER Smart Test Infrastructure currently cannot be supported.
See https://aisler.net/blog/electrical-testing-on-steroids
Proposed Solution
Implement an export function that conforms to IPC Netlist standard (Similar to KiCad).