Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
How are you running Emma? Does it actually affect the output or is it just
warnings?
It is true that generated CGLIB classes will never contains debug info, but
hopefully
Emma should just ignore those.
Original comment by chris.no...@gmail.com
on 23 Apr 2007 at 1:27
I ran a coverage report using IntelliJ and everything worked just fine. The
EMMA warnings are fair - it's just
fine that we don't can't generate coverage reports for generated classes.
EMMA: collecting runtime coverage data ...
EMMA: runtime controller started on port [47653]
EMMA: package [com/oogle/nject] contains classes
[BinderTest$Foo$$FastClassByGuice$$91ae42d3] without
full debug info
EMMA: package [com/oogle/nject/nternal] contains classes
[LineNumbersTest$A$$EnhancerByGuice$$a013a858] without full debug info
EMMA: package [com/oogle/nject/atcher] contains classes [$Proxy27] without full
debug info
raw session data saved to
[/sers/essewilson/ibrary/aches/ntelliJIDEA70/overage/uice$AllTests$AllTests.es]
{in 62 ms}
It's weird that EMMA drops the first characters in all of its paths though.
Original comment by limpbizkit
on 31 May 2008 at 7:06
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
kevin...@gmail.com
on 20 Apr 2007 at 7:02