issues
search
fsfe
/
reuse-docs
REUSE recommendations, tutorials, FAQ and specification
https://reuse.software
19
stars
20
forks
source link
issues
Newest
Newest
Most commented
Recently updated
Oldest
Least commented
Least recently updated
Bump to v3.0
#47
carmenbianca
closed
5 years ago
0
Language around copyright holders should be adjusted for public domain works
#46
LynnKirby
closed
3 years ago
8
Improve display on website
#45
mxmehl
closed
5 years ago
0
Rephrase public domain sentence
#44
carmenbianca
closed
5 years ago
0
A way to log origin for attribution
#43
silverhook
opened
5 years ago
10
FAQ: Remove sections on license files outside of LICENSES/
#42
carmenbianca
closed
5 years ago
0
anticipate and strengthen FOSS recommendation
#41
zacchiro
closed
5 years ago
3
Remove PDF versions and Dockerfile
#40
mxmehl
closed
5 years ago
0
Before release of 3.0 Spec and Tutorial, make sure the `reuse lint` tool works correctly
#39
silverhook
closed
5 years ago
3
Tutorial: Split off tutorials for specific/advanced use cases
#38
silverhook
closed
5 years ago
5
FAQ: Add advice on packages/tarballs
#37
carmenbianca
opened
5 years ago
1
Spec: How to handle submodules
#36
carmenbianca
closed
1 year ago
17
FAQ: Add Joinup licensing chooser
#35
silverhook
closed
5 years ago
1
Spec: How to mark snippets
#34
silverhook
closed
2 years ago
4
Spec: Fix the "Format of copyright notices" section
#33
carmenbianca
closed
5 years ago
6
FAQ: Explain how to do custom exceptions
#32
carmenbianca
closed
5 years ago
3
Spec: How to do multiple licenses without "AND" in DEP5
#31
carmenbianca
closed
5 years ago
5
Spec: Define "DEP5"
#30
carmenbianca
closed
5 years ago
5
Spec: Define what files go into `.reuse/`
#29
carmenbianca
closed
5 years ago
5
Spec: Define copyright notice prefixes
#28
carmenbianca
closed
5 years ago
7
Spec: Mandate that licenses be in the LICENSES/ directory
#27
carmenbianca
closed
5 years ago
10
Spec: Define "Project" or "Package"
#26
carmenbianca
closed
5 years ago
3
Spec: Add a statement at the start clarifying that a comment header in every file is preferable
#25
carmenbianca
closed
5 years ago
4
Spec: License Files must be in plain text
#24
silverhook
closed
5 years ago
4
Create a new REUSE Specification
#23
carmenbianca
closed
5 years ago
7
Fixes #21: Make the repository compliant with REUSE
#22
carmenbianca
closed
5 years ago
0
The repository falsely advertises being REUSE compliant
#21
carmenbianca
closed
5 years ago
0
Redefining the three steps
#20
carmenbianca
closed
5 years ago
5
Add a tutorial
#19
carmenbianca
closed
5 years ago
0
Create an FAQ
#18
carmenbianca
closed
5 years ago
9
Fix README.md: display contact address in markdown
#17
bernhardreiter
closed
5 years ago
1
Better handle licenses that have SPDX templates/variables (e.g. MIT, BSD)
#16
silverhook
closed
4 years ago
14
Removed explicit example, to avoid recommending this use too much.
#15
jonasob
closed
5 years ago
0
How to handle non-copyrightable files (e.g. simple config files)
#14
silverhook
closed
5 years ago
10
General cleanup
#13
silverhook
closed
6 years ago
0
Fix s2 summary
#12
silverhook
closed
6 years ago
0
Fix copyright statements
#11
silverhook
closed
6 years ago
2
Fix exception identifier
#10
silverhook
closed
5 years ago
7
Clean up summary of §2
#9
silverhook
closed
6 years ago
0
Refine how documentation licensing should be done
#8
silverhook
closed
3 years ago
2
Better clarify the three options of how to store a license text
#7
silverhook
closed
5 years ago
3
Clarify that the upstream accepting contributions is actually on GitHub (and git.fsfe.org is just a mirror)
#6
silverhook
closed
4 years ago
1
Adopt a simpler copyright statement that is actually compatible with the US legislation
#5
silverhook
closed
6 years ago
3
Change exception identifier to avoid confusion with SPDX spec
#4
silverhook
closed
5 years ago
2
Cover +/-or-later/-only
#3
silverhook
opened
6 years ago
7
Fix SPDX repository of plain text licenses
#2
silverhook
closed
6 years ago
0
should recommend choosing a FOSS license
#1
zacchiro
closed
5 years ago
4
Previous