Closed dsyme closed 8 years ago
I guess I wrote it to make it closer to the other syntax which is series [ ... ]
, so series <| ...
looks more similarly. No preference though. I also don't normally use <|
and these days, I'd probably write just series (...)
.
I think merging this makes sense and since it's just documentation tweak, I'm going to do that.
(I don't expect @hmansell or @adamklein to disagree!)
No disagreement here. Although I'm embarassed to say I generally overuse the :)
operator
I don't personally recommend the use of
<|
in cases when|>
will serve just as well. Is there any specific reason to be using back-piping here? Thanks