Proofs

[fsolt]

Proofs came in at 7:34am today; they ask that they be returned within three days. Let's aim to return it by the end of the day tomorrow (Friday). I'd like each of you to go through the whole list: I've created a document with the list of queries from the editor, paper/proofs.txt, for you to work from and take notes in. Once you're in agreement, you can divide up the task of entering the changes into the proof—in Acrobat Reader, per the editorial directions—as you see fit, though it’s probably best for just one of you to take charge of that job, given the non-Git-able nature of the thing.

[kwhudson]

Apologies for being late in getting my thoughts added to the proofs.txt file. It looks like we are largely in agreement on most of the points, though there are a few that might need further discussion - primarily whether we keep the NJL 2015a and 2015b distinction or collapse the article and replication data into a single citation.

If we can come to a consensus on how to handle this and a coupe other minor issues we can move forward on commenting on the pdf.

[fsolt]

We have to keep them as separate citations, ref'd as they are; the copy editor just doesn't know the difference--and to their credit, they asked. Often, unfortunately, copy editors will change what they don't understand.

[fsolt]

Good question re the address, Hu. I'm going to keep it as 341 because that is where mail goes; I mean, that is my mailing address on campus (and, incidentally, yours too).

[fsolt]

Re point 3: Add the URL to the cite as Hu says. Note also that the subtitle should be upright, not italicized.

[fsolt]

Re point 4: Newman BJ (Forthcoming) Breaking the glass ceiling: Local gender-based earnings inequality and women’s belief in the American Dream. American Journal of Political Science. doi:10.1111/ajps.12195

[fsolt]

Re point 5: Newman BJ, Johnston CD and Lown PL (2015b) Replication data for: False consciousness or class awareness? Local income inequality, personal economic position, and belief in American meritocracy. Harvard Dataverse. doi:10.7910/DVN/26584

[fsolt]

Re point 6: They'll format as they see fit (though I think that Jungmin is probably right). The answer to their questions is simply that the editors are Lisa A. Keister and Darren E. Sherkat, and the place of publication is New York.

[fsolt]

Re point 10:

The pages are 1-31. It's actually published, so there's no need for a doi in the cite.

[fsolt]

Re point 11:

As I said earlier, we have to keep them as separate citations, referenced as they are.

[fsolt]

Okay, which of you is going to enter the answers into the PDF?

[jsong10]

I will enter the answers into the PDF. I will send the PDF file to you when I complete.

[jsong10]

RAP672101 with comments.pdf @fsolt @kwhudson @sammo3182 @dongericoyu