search

ftCommunity / ftcommunity-TXT

Fischertechnik ROBOTICS TXT firmware, community edition
http://cfw.ftcommunity.de/
GNU General Public License v3.0
46 stars 31 forks source link

State of harbaum/TouchUI vs TXT/TouchUI? #166

Closed heuer closed 1 year ago

heuer commented 5 years ago

For a newbie like me it's unclear which repository is mandatory.

The file TouchStyle.py is even with https://github.com/harbaum/TouchUI/blob/master/touchui/TouchStyle.py but launcher.py contains a lot of changes which have not been migrated to https://github.com/harbaum/TouchUI/blob/master/touchui/launcher.py. Maybe by intention, but this wasn't clear, at least for me.

I modified https://github.com/harbaum/TouchUI/blob/master/touchui/launcher.py since I thought the changes can be easily applied to the ft-TXT revision but I was mistaken.

I try to incoperate my changes to https://github.com/harbaum/TouchUI/blob/master/touchui/launcher.py to the ft-TXT version but it would have been helpful to know that TouchUI is not ft-TXT/TouchUI in advance.

Maybe it's my fault, but I couldn't find any document which would have told me the differences. In the future, any modification to TouchStyle.py should go to harbaum/TouchUI and modifications to launcher.py should be applied to this repository, I guess?

hypnotoad commented 2 years ago

@harbaum : What is your opinion here? I have done lots of changes during the Qt5 migration in the ftcommunity-TXT branch. How active do you want to be in future development of launcher or touchstyle?

harbaum commented 2 years ago

TouchUI started as a standalone project. Development then continued in the txt firmware and became somewhat txt specific. I don't see a reason to backport it. Just ignore the separate repo.

ski7777 commented 1 year ago

I think we can close this here