Closed ftyers closed 8 months ago
López Austin:
Y las mujeres le decían: "Quieto, putón. ¿Acaso perforaste el cabello con el que habré de beber? Porque aún no es tiempo de que me vaya."
Questions:
ADV
or a PART
. Andrews (p.40) puts it in the same category as ca. Is cuix an ADV or a PART. Andrews (p.40) puts it in the same category as ca.
In nhi, we tag the equivalent mox/max as ADV
(I think we decided on a general avoidance of PART
wherever possible. In azz, it is always tagged as SCONJ
, which is probably because in that corpus it is only used with subordinate clauses, but we should check this out, as I suspect it behaves like in nhi, so could also be used in the matrix clause.
I think that potentially it might be different in nci
and in azz
/nhi
. But yes, I agree that this is something that we need to standardise on.
In terms of avoidance/not, I think if the distribution is different/specific/functional enough, and if it is treated like that in the grammars, then it isn't the worst thing in the world to use PART
. But don't tell me-10-years-ago that :D
It appears that cuix has a similar distribution to max/mox and ox in azz, and is used witih both matrix and subordinated clauses. Looking at other languages in UD, I think PART
is consistent, since this is how both question particles in Japanese and sentence-modality particles in Czech are treated https://universaldependencies.org/u/pos/PART.html
I also now think this is how we should annotate the corresponding words in contemporary Nahuatl treebanks.
What is the structure of in tzontli ic natlitiaz ?
tzontli should be the obj of oticcoyonih right? and then I guess advcl(oticcoyonih, natlitiaz)
and obl(natlitiaz, ic)
?
NOUN
and have obl
relation.What is the structure of ca yamo cuel in niyaz?
something like...
How about this?
LGTM
Merged in 5814c38.