Closed LoganDark closed 4 years ago
Oversight, PR welcome :)
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020, 4:06 AM LoganDark notifications@github.com wrote:
It seems PartialEq is not implemented for the f64 types!
However, the f32 types do have PartialEq, so what gives?
Example:
rotor3s!( Rotor3 => (Mat3, Vec3, Bivec3, f32), Rotor3x4 => (Mat3x4, Vec3x4, Bivec3x4, f32x4), Rotor3x8 => (Mat3x8, Vec3x8, Bivec3x8, f32x8) ); impl std::cmp::PartialEq for Rotor3 { fn eq(&self, other: &Self) -> bool { self.s == other.s && self.bv == other.bv } }
[cfg(feature = "f64")]rotor3s!(
DRotor3 => (DMat3, DVec3, DBivec3, f64), DRotor3x2 => (DMat3x2, DVec3x2, DBivec3x2, f64x2), DRotor3x4 => (DMat3x4, DVec3x4, DBivec3x4, f64x4)
); // No PartialEq for DRotor3? Come to think of it, DBivec3 doesn't have one either, even though Bivec3 does...
Should I PR? Was this an oversight or an intentional decision?
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/termhn/ultraviolet/issues/82, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGYXH7K5TU764ZXFR2B6TDSLASLHANCNFSM4STGEURQ .
It seems PartialEq is not implemented for the f64 types!
However, the f32 types do have PartialEq, so what gives?
Example:
Should I PR? Was this an oversight or an intentional decision?