Closed jsoo1 closed 2 years ago
I think the license for libbpf-async should be the same as libbpf-rs, since it depends on it as a library. I think it is dual licensed under the same licenses as libbpf itself (lgpl2.1 and bsd2).
sounds reasonable. fixed. thanks.
fujita
commented
2 years ago
I think the license for libbpf-async should be the same as libbpf-rs, since it depends on it as a library. I think it is dual licensed under the same licenses as libbpf itself (lgpl2.1 and bsd2).