Open zen-wq opened 3 years ago
It can be easily if a little kludgy implemented as an inflator/deflator. A list of objects that is deflated with (prin1-to-string (mapcar #'mito:object-id list))
and inflated with (mito:select-dao 'class (where (:in :id (read-from-string data))))
Is it worth it to implement many-to-many relations properly with a :col-type
and an automatic intersection table?
I've been thinking of how we can make table relations easy in Mito. So, this is actually worth discussing.
We can use many-to-many relational tables for joining with both tables, but your list
type can't.
There's no effective way to fetch rows related to a person
row in your example.
Due to its inflexibility, I'm not sure that there are many situations where we can use it.
My second comment was a simple kludgy way of implementing it without touching mito. The original proposal (the first comment) was to automatically create and maintain many-to-many relational tables in mito.
I think maybe extending include macro could work, let's imagine we have a human tablet, an eye-color table and a human-eye-color table, now let's supose include macro had the following syntax
(mito:select-dao 'eye-color (includes 'human :from 'human-eye-color))
Keep heterochromia in mind.
Or maybe a has macro with a syntax like:
(mito:select-dao 'human (has 'eye-color from 'human-eye-color))
I think the later could solve needs that some users are trying to work around with inflate functions, but I think buffing inflation functions would give users more power also.
Being able to chain relations would be very nice, like in the last examen example.
The proposal is to add a column type like
(list :integer)
which will create a separate table to store list items. List items are all eagerly fetched. Also, handle types like(list person)
to create many-to-many relations with optional eager loading (withincludes
).Do you think it's a good fit for mito or is it too far from plain SQL?