Closed FBruzzesi closed 4 months ago
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
Name | Status | Preview | Comments | Updated (UTC) |
---|---|---|---|---|
functime-docs | ✅ Ready (Inspect) | Visit Preview | 💬 Add feedback | Jan 12, 2024 3:06pm |
Will check later today - for the meantime, thanks a lot! Wanted to get this done. Would merge #161 before this. Any comments on that?
Thanks for getting back to me, let me know what you think regarding having a default value 😊 After that I would say that I can mark it as ready for review
Thanks for getting back to me, let me know what you think regarding having a default value 😊 After that I would say that I can mark it as ready for review
I would like to have a default value. We might go with sklearn's default. You worked in the field though, what would you use as a reasonable value? @ngriffiths13 might also know some heuristics.
Thanks for getting back to me, let me know what you think regarding having a default value 😊 After that I would say that I can mark it as ready for review
I would like to have a default value. We might go with sklearn's default. You worked in the field though, what would you use as a reasonable value? @ngriffiths13 might also know some heuristics.
I would use .25 as the default value.
Seems great! @ngriffiths13 how are we with tests, did you manage to reduce the duration? Should Francesco add the tests for the new train_test_split
?
Should Francesco add the tests for the new
train_test_split
?
Added a few basic tests
Description
This is a first draft of how I would address and fix #167 to add support for float in
train_test_split
. I noticed typing has some issues but it is already been addresses in #161.Question: Would you like to have a default value (e.g. 25% as in scikit-learn) for the test size?