Closed funderburkjim closed 2 years ago
@funderburkjim
would changing [Seite1.101] into \
I would suggest moving all F.s immediately after the D.s belonging to a set of S.s; thus every piece of data belonging to resp. S no.(s) will be together as a single block.
After all we are not going to print a book, but just making a digital text for cross-linking. [Incidentally, this is how @drdhaval2785 is marking the FN.s in his digitisation of the commentary works for traditional Skt. lexicons; I have helped him making one such.]
BTW @funderburkjim, there are some G.(s) [Greek text blocks] under some verses, and @thomasincambodia suggested me to take your consent for making those texts.
Pl. have a look at #16, where the discussion took place, and give your opinion.
moving all F.s immediately after the D.s belonging to a set of S.s; thus every piece of data belonging to resp. S no.(s) will be together as a single block.
This is the way @thomasincambodia is handling footnotes. Similarly for 'V' and 'W' sections, which are 'corrections/additions'. Everything for a 'saying' is together. In the xml form derived from Thomas digitization, these are called 'entry' elements, and an entry has all the children (sections) belonging to the verse. (see boesp.dtd, which is used to validate the boesp.xml).
would changing [Seite1.101] into
<pb n=1.101\>
help?
@thomasincambodia
I don't think so. Just keep [Seite1.101]
form for now.
is it a time to close this issue?
This is to document a known bug in the xml creation.
The confirming example is D545. Here, the verse (
<S> abhyodhiH etc.
) starts on page 100, but make_xml.py generates<info n="L=545: S,D,F 1.101"/>
,which should be
<info n="L=545: S,D,F 1.100"/>
This happens because a footnote to D544 (
<F>544
) has a page break[Seite1.101]
and the<F>
occurs sequentially before the<S> abhyodhiH etc.
Some way is needed to correct this.