Open funderburkjim opened 2 years ago
I prefer to drop the
Boehtlingk does not provide a list of LS because, using the LS in
to drop the tag and tag the literaray references after correcting
Sounds fine to me.
pushed corrected boesp.all_ansi.txt
@thomasincambodia -- I find that latest commit (commit hash starts with ffa74d729, per git log)
has removed all the <ls>
, as expected.
@funderburkjim,
There is one odd-man ls word RA120JANi1TI at <F>3737
, which should've been RA1JANI1TI.
Does the author provide such a list in boesp print?
Boehtlingk does not provide a list of LS
I see that all the three Indische Spruche tomes, as also the two Melanges Asiatiques supplements, did mention the referred works (in the beginning pages). [Of course, as usual everywhere else, there could be some additional sources not explicitly mentioned in the books, but cited inside.]
The file boesp_auth_v0.txt contains the abbreviations of referred works as listed in volumes 1-3.
I don't see similar lists in 4.1 and 4.2 pdfs -- What source names from these two Melanges Asiatiques supplements should be added to the boesp_auth_v0 file?
There are many literary source references in the footnotes and corrections of boesp.
These are coded in boesp.all_ansi.txt using all capital latin letters. The author uses a version of IAST that is coded in a unique way in the digitization:
<ls>
tag (without closing</ls>
tag).</ls>
tag<ls>X</ls>
.S4A1RN5G. PADDH. SUBHA1SH. (in F105)