Open funderburkjim opened 5 years ago
asmad has same declension in all genders; to avoid needless repetition, only the m_card model is associated with it.
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | aham | AvAm | vayam |
Accusative | mAm/mA | AvAm/nO | asmAn/naH |
Instrumental | mayA | AvAByAm | asmABiH |
Dative | mahyam/me | AvAByAm/nO | asmaByam/naH |
Ablative | mat | AvAByAm | asmat |
Genitive | mama/me | AvayoH/nO | asmAkam/naH |
Locative | mayi | AvayoH | asmAsu |
Vocative |
yuzmad has same declension in all genders; to avoid needless repetition, only the m_card model is associated with it.
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | tvam | yuvAm | yUyam |
Accusative | tvAm/tvA | yuvAm/vAm | yuzmAn/vaH |
Instrumental | tvayA | yuvAByAm | yuzmABiH |
Dative | tuByam/te | yuvAByAm/vAm | yuzmaByam/vaH |
Ablative | tvat | yuvAByAm | yuzmat |
Genitive | tava/te | yuvayoH/vAm | yuzmAkam/vaH |
Locative | tvayi | yuvayoH | yuzmAsu |
Vocative |
The 3rd person pronoun is declined in all genders.
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | saH | tO | te |
Accusative | tam | tO | tAn |
Instrumental | tena | tAByAm | tEH |
Dative | tasmE | tAByAm | teByaH |
Ablative | tasmAt | tAByAm | teByaH |
Genitive | tasya | tayoH | tezAm |
Locative | tasmin | tayoH | tezu |
Vocative |
The neuter declension is same as masculine except for Nominative and Accusative cases.
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | tat | te | tAni |
Accusative | tat | te | tAni |
Instrumental | tena | tAByAm | tEH |
Dative | tasmE | tAByAm | teByaH |
Ablative | tasmAt | tAByAm | teByaH |
Genitive | tasya | tayoH | tezAm |
Locative | tasmin | tayoH | tezu |
Vocative |
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | sA | te | tAH |
Accusative | tAm | te | tAH |
Instrumental | tayA | tAByAm | tABiH |
Dative | tasyE | tAByAm | tAByaH |
Ablative | tasyAH | tAByAm | tAByaH |
Genitive | tasyAH | tayoH | tAsAm |
Locative | tasyAm | tayoH | tAsu |
Vocative |
tyad is decline analogously to tad - y is inserted after the initial letter in each form.
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | syaH | tyO | tye |
Accusative | tyam | tyO | tyAn |
Instrumental | tyena | tyAByAm | tyEH |
Dative | tyasmE | tyAByAm | tyeByaH |
Ablative | tyasmAt | tyAByAm | tyeByaH |
Genitive | tyasya | tyayoH | tyezAm |
Locative | tyasmin | tyayoH | tyezu |
Vocative |
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | tyat | tye | tyAni |
Accusative | tyat | tye | tyAni |
Instrumental | tyena | tyAByAm | tyEH |
Dative | tyasmE | tyAByAm | tyeByaH |
Ablative | tyasmAt | tyAByAm | tyeByaH |
Genitive | tyasya | tyayoH | tyezAm |
Locative | tyasmin | tyayoH | tyezu |
Vocative |
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | syA | tye | tyAH |
Accusative | tyAm | tye | tyAH |
Instrumental | tyayA | tyAByAm | tyABiH |
Dative | tyasyE | tyAByAm | tyAByaH |
Ablative | tyasyAH | tyAByAm | tyAByaH |
Genitive | tyasyAH | tyayoH | tyAsAm |
Locative | tyasyAm | tyayoH | tyAsu |
Vocative |
The declensions of etad are also quite similar to those of tad with the differences:
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | ezaH | etO | ete |
Accusative | etam/enam | etO/enO | etAn/enAn |
Instrumental | etena/enena | etAByAm | etEH |
Dative | etasmE | etAByAm | eteByaH |
Ablative | etasmAt | etAByAm | eteByaH |
Genitive | etasya | etayoH/enayoH | etezAm |
Locative | etasmin | etayoH/enayoH | etezu |
Vocative |
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | etat | ete | etAni |
Accusative | etat/enat | ete/ene | etAni/enAni |
Instrumental | etena/enena | etAByAm | etEH |
Dative | etasmE | etAByAm | eteByaH |
Ablative | etasmAt | etAByAm | eteByaH |
Genitive | etasya | etayoH/enayoH | etezAm |
Locative | etasmin | etayoH/enayoH | etezu |
Vocative |
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | ezA | ete | etAH |
Accusative | etAm/enAm | ete/ene | etAH/enAH |
Instrumental | etayA/enayA | etAByAm | etABiH |
Dative | etasyE | etAByAm | etAByaH |
Ablative | etasyAH | etAByAm | etAByaH |
Genitive | etasyAH | etayoH/enayoH | etAsAm |
Locative | etasyAm | etayoH/enayoH | etAsu |
Vocative |
The declined forms of the relative pronoun yad are quite similar to those of tad. A form for yad could be obtained from the corresponding form of tad by replacing the initial t (or s) with y.
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | yaH | yO | ye |
Accusative | yam | yO | yAn |
Instrumental | yena | yAByAm | yEH |
Dative | yasmE | yAByAm | yeByaH |
Ablative | yasmAt | yAByAm | yeByaH |
Genitive | yasya | yayoH | yezAm |
Locative | yasmin | yayoH | yezu |
Vocative |
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | yat | ye | yAni |
Accusative | yat | ye | yAni |
Instrumental | yena | yAByAm | yEH |
Dative | yasmE | yAByAm | yeByaH |
Ablative | yasmAt | yAByAm | yeByaH |
Genitive | yasya | yayoH | yezAm |
Locative | yasmin | yayoH | yezu |
Vocative |
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | yA | ye | yAH |
Accusative | yAm | ye | yAH |
Instrumental | yayA | yAByAm | yABiH |
Dative | yasyE | yAByAm | yAByaH |
Ablative | yasyAH | yAByAm | yAByaH |
Genitive | yasyAH | yayoH | yAsAm |
Locative | yasyAm | yayoH | yAsu |
Vocative |
The declined forms of the interrogative pronoun kim are quite similar to those of yad. A form for kim can be obtained from the corresponding form of yad by
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | kaH | kO | ke |
Accusative | kam | kO | kAn |
Instrumental | kena | kAByAm | kEH |
Dative | kasmE | kAByAm | keByaH |
Ablative | kasmAt | kAByAm | keByaH |
Genitive | kasya | kayoH | kezAm |
Locative | kasmin | kayoH | kezu |
Vocative |
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | kim | ke | kAni |
Accusative | kim | ke | kAni |
Instrumental | kena | kAByAm | kEH |
Dative | kasmE | kAByAm | keByaH |
Ablative | kasmAt | kAByAm | keByaH |
Genitive | kasya | kayoH | kezAm |
Locative | kasmin | kayoH | kezu |
Vocative |
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | kA | ke | kAH |
Accusative | kAm | ke | kAH |
Instrumental | kayA | kAByAm | kABiH |
Dative | kasyE | kAByAm | kAByaH |
Ablative | kasyAH | kAByAm | kAByaH |
Genitive | kasyAH | kayoH | kAsAm |
Locative | kasyAm | kayoH | kAsu |
Vocative |
The declined forms of idam are sui-generis. Note that there are optional enclitic forms; and these are in fact the same optional forms as appear for the declined forms of etad.
It is an oddity that from the instrumental dual through locative plural, a given (non-enclitic) form for idam is the same as the corresponding form for, say, kim, except for the removal of the initial letter of the kim form. For example, the instrumental dual of f_pron kim is kAByAM; remove the k and you get AByAm, which is the instrumental dual of f_pron idam.
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | ayam | imO | ime |
Accusative | imam/enam | imO/enO | imAn/enAn |
Instrumental | anena/enena | AByAm | eBiH |
Dative | asmE | AByAm | eByaH |
Ablative | asmAt | AByAm | eByaH |
Genitive | asya | anayoH/enayoH | ezAm |
Locative | asmin | anayoH/enayoH | ezu |
Vocative |
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | idam | ime | imAni |
Accusative | idam/enat | ime/ene | imAni/enAni |
Instrumental | anena/enena | AByAm | eBiH |
Dative | asmE | AByAm | eByaH |
Ablative | asmAt | AByAm | eByaH |
Genitive | asya | anayoH/enayoH | ezAm |
Locative | asmin | anayoH/enayoH | ezu |
Vocative |
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | iyam | ime | imAH |
Accusative | imAm/enAm | ime/ene | imAH/enAH |
Instrumental | anayA/enayA | AByAm | ABiH |
Dative | asyE | AByAm | AByaH |
Ablative | asyAH | AByAm | AByaH |
Genitive | asyAH | anayoH/enayoH | AsAm |
Locative | asyAm | anayoH/enayoH | Asu |
Vocative |
The declensions of adas are quite different from other pronouns.
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | asO | amU | amI |
Accusative | amum | amU | amUn |
Instrumental | amunA | amUByAm | amIBiH |
Dative | amuzmE | amUByAm | amIByaH |
Ablative | amuzmAt | amUByAm | amIByaH |
Genitive | amuzya | amuyoH | amIzAm |
Locative | amuzmin | amuyoH | amIzu |
Vocative |
As with other pronouns, the Instrumental through Locative cases have the same declined forms in the neuter gender as in the masculine gender.
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | adaH | amU | amUni |
Accusative | adaH | amU | amUni |
Instrumental | amunA | amUByAm | amIBiH |
Dative | amuzmE | amUByAm | amIByaH |
Ablative | amuzmAt | amUByAm | amIByaH |
Genitive | amuzya | amuyoH | amIzAm |
Locative | amuzmin | amuyoH | amIzu |
Vocative |
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | asO | amU | amUH |
Accusative | amUm | amU | amUH |
Instrumental | amuyA | amUByAm | amUBiH |
Dative | amuzyE | amUByAm | amUByaH |
Ablative | amuzyAH | amUByAm | amUByaH |
Genitive | amuzyAH | amuyoH | amUzAm |
Locative | amuzyAm | amuyoH | amUzu |
Vocative |
The declensions of Bavat with m_pron and n_pron models is analogous to that of Bagavat with the m_vat and n_vat models (per Kale observation). With our computational framework we can verify this for the masculine by comparing the results of two computations:
python decline_one.py m_pron Bavat
and python decline_one.py m_vat Bavat
.
These two computations show the same results.
And similarly for the neuter gender.
Similarly, the f_pron declension of Bavat is the same as the f_I declension of BavatI.
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | BavAn | BavantO | BavantaH |
Accusative | Bavantam | BavantO | BavataH |
Instrumental | BavatA | BavadByAm | BavadBiH |
Dative | Bavate | BavadByAm | BavadByaH |
Ablative | BavataH | BavadByAm | BavadByaH |
Genitive | BavataH | BavatoH | BavatAm |
Locative | Bavati | BavatoH | Bavatsu |
Vocative | Bavan | BavantO | BavantaH |
The Vocative case appears here for the first time in this presentation. In our declensions, application of the pronominal models to Bavat and any other pronominal declensions discussed below will include forms for the Vocative case. Kale never shows a vocative case for a pronoun. Bucknell shows vocative case for the sarva paradigm, and mentions its applicability for several other pronouns.
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | Bavat | BavatI | Bavanti |
Accusative | Bavat | BavatI | Bavanti |
Instrumental | BavatA | BavadByAm | BavadBiH |
Dative | Bavate | BavadByAm | BavadByaH |
Ablative | BavataH | BavadByAm | BavadByaH |
Genitive | BavataH | BavatoH | BavatAm |
Locative | Bavati | BavatoH | Bavatsu |
Vocative | Bavat | BavatI | Bavanti |
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | BavatI | BavatyO | BavatyaH |
Accusative | BavatIm | BavatyO | BavatIH |
Instrumental | BavatyA | BavatIByAm | BavatIBiH |
Dative | BavatyE | BavatIByAm | BavatIByaH |
Ablative | BavatyAH | BavatIByAm | BavatIByaH |
Genitive | BavatyAH | BavatyoH | BavatInAm |
Locative | BavatyAm | BavatyoH | BavatIzu |
Vocative | Bavati | BavatyO | BavatyaH |
These are listed in the first comment above : anya, anyatara , etc. (Kale section 147).
Kale says these are declined in all the three genders like *yad*
.
Here's how our computation implements this:
Although the declensions of yad show no vocative case, we compute a vocative cases for the pronominal adjectives. For those of the anya group, the vocative endings are:
Note: I found no printed example that
Should I drop vocative case from the declensions of anya group? I don't see it doing any harm to have a vocative form. It seems possible semantically to use a vocative, say of itara : Bo itarad mitra ! kim karozi ? (when talking to two friends, say). If vocative is kept for the anya group, do others agree on the form (especially of neuter) ?
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | itaraH | itarO | itare |
Accusative | itaram | itarO | itarAn |
Instrumental | itareRa | itarAByAm | itarEH |
Dative | itarasmE | itarAByAm | itareByaH |
Ablative | itarasmAt | itarAByAm | itareByaH |
Genitive | itarasya | itarayoH | itarezAm |
Locative | itarasmin | itarayoH | itarezu |
Vocative | itara | itarO | itare |
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | itarat | itare | itarARi |
Accusative | itarat | itare | itarARi |
Instrumental | itareRa | itarAByAm | itarEH |
Dative | itarasmE | itarAByAm | itareByaH |
Ablative | itarasmAt | itarAByAm | itareByaH |
Genitive | itarasya | itarayoH | itarezAm |
Locative | itarasmin | itarayoH | itarezu |
Vocative | itarat | itare | itarARi |
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | itarA | itare | itarAH |
Accusative | itarAm | itare | itarAH |
Instrumental | itarayA | itarAByAm | itarABiH |
Dative | itarasyE | itarAByAm | itarAByaH |
Ablative | itarasyAH | itarAByAm | itarAByaH |
Genitive | itarasyAH | itarayoH | itarAsAm |
Locative | itarasyAm | itarayoH | itarAsu |
Vocative | itare | itare | itarAH |
Similar declension for: anya, anyatara, itara, ekatama, katara, katama, yatara, yatama, tatara, tatama
These are declined like anya except:
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | sarvaH | sarvO | sarve |
Accusative | sarvam | sarvO | sarvAn |
Instrumental | sarveRa | sarvAByAm | sarvEH |
Dative | sarvasmE | sarvAByAm | sarveByaH |
Ablative | sarvasmAt | sarvAByAm | sarveByaH |
Genitive | sarvasya | sarvayoH | sarvezAm |
Locative | sarvasmin | sarvayoH | sarvezu |
Vocative | sarva | sarvO | sarve |
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | sarvam | sarve | sarvARi |
Accusative | sarvam | sarve | sarvARi |
Instrumental | sarveRa | sarvAByAm | sarvEH |
Dative | sarvasmE | sarvAByAm | sarveByaH |
Ablative | sarvasmAt | sarvAByAm | sarveByaH |
Genitive | sarvasya | sarvayoH | sarvezAm |
Locative | sarvasmin | sarvayoH | sarvezu |
Vocative | sarva | sarve | sarvARi |
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | sarvA | sarve | sarvAH |
Accusative | sarvAm | sarve | sarvAH |
Instrumental | sarvayA | sarvAByAm | sarvABiH |
Dative | sarvasyE | sarvAByAm | sarvAByaH |
Ablative | sarvasyAH | sarvAByAm | sarvAByaH |
Genitive | sarvasyAH | sarvayoH | sarvAsAm |
Locative | sarvasyAm | sarvayoH | sarvAsu |
Vocative | sarve | sarve | sarvAH |
sarva, viSva, sima, uBa, uBaya, ekatara, tva
Note: Kale says uBa should only decline in the dual number, and uBaya only in the singular and plural number. However, our declension tables currently show forms in all three numbers for these two words. Should having these extra forms be considered an error?
As mentioned in the first comment of this issue, our declensions follow the description of Kale. These are declined analogously to sarva in the neuter and feminine; but have some optional forms (like deva) in some of the three masculine forms:
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | svaH | svO | sve/svAH |
Accusative | svam | svO | svAn |
Instrumental | svena | svAByAm | svEH |
Dative | svasmE | svAByAm | sveByaH |
Ablative | svasmAt/svAt | svAByAm | sveByaH |
Genitive | svasya | svayoH | svezAm |
Locative | svasmin/sve | svayoH | svezu |
Vocative | sva | svO | sve |
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | nemaH | nemO | neme/nemAH |
Accusative | nemam | nemO | nemAn |
Instrumental | nemena | nemAByAm | nemEH |
Dative | nemasmE | nemAByAm | nemeByaH |
Ablative | nemasmAt | nemAByAm | nemeByaH |
Genitive | nemasya | nemayoH | nemezAm |
Locative | nemasmin | nemayoH | nemezu |
Vocative | nema | nemO | neme |
Kale's list: pUrva, avara, dakziRa, uttara, apara, aDara. Bucknell also mentions para, and I treat it similarly.
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | pUrvaH | pUrvO | pUrve/pUrvAH |
Accusative | pUrvam | pUrvO | pUrvAn |
Instrumental | pUrveRa | pUrvAByAm | pUrvEH |
Dative | pUrvasmE | pUrvAByAm | pUrveByaH |
Ablative | pUrvasmAt | pUrvAByAm | pUrveByaH |
Genitive | pUrvasya | pUrvayoH | pUrvezAm |
Locative | pUrvasmin/pUrve | pUrvayoH | pUrvezu |
Vocative | pUrva | pUrvO | pUrve |
tvat and tva are synoyms of anya, according to Kale. Kale mentions that some grammars decline tvat using the normal case-terminations (see Kale Section 57). My interpretation of this is:
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | tvat | tvatO | tvataH |
Accusative | tvatam | tvatO | tvataH |
Instrumental | tvatA | tvadByAm | tvadBiH |
Dative | tvate | tvadByAm | tvadByaH |
Ablative | tvataH | tvadByAm | tvadByaH |
Genitive | tvataH | tvatoH | tvatAm |
Locative | tvati | tvatoH | tvatsu |
Vocative | tvat | tvatO | tvataH |
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | tvat | tvatI | tvati |
Accusative | tvat | tvatI | tvati |
Instrumental | tvatA | tvadByAm | tvadBiH |
Dative | tvate | tvadByAm | tvadByaH |
Ablative | tvataH | tvadByAm | tvadByaH |
Genitive | tvataH | tvatoH | tvatAm |
Locative | tvati | tvatoH | tvatsu |
Vocative | tvat | tvatI | tvati |
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | tvat | tvatO | tvataH |
Accusative | tvatam | tvatO | tvataH |
Instrumental | tvatA | tvadByAm | tvadBiH |
Dative | tvate | tvadByAm | tvadByaH |
Ablative | tvataH | tvadByAm | tvadByaH |
Genitive | tvataH | tvatoH | tvatAm |
Locative | tvati | tvatoH | tvatsu |
Vocative | tvat | tvatO | tvataH |
It would be good to have confirmation of these forms from a Sanskrit expert. Only the masculine nominative has been confirmed by published source, by Kale (Section 149).
By pronominal compound here is meant a compound whose last part is a pronoun.
For compounds in general, a rule of thumb is that the compound is declined according to the declension of the last word. Probably there are various special cases mentioned by Panini where this rule of thumb does not hold when the last pada is a noun. But I encountered such a rule (Pan. 1.1.29) that appears to specifically apply to pronominal compounds, and thus am very tentative in coding the declension of pronominal compounds according to the declension of the final pronoun.
Here are the cases of such compounds supported by references; the current declension algorithms generate forms based on the pronominal declension of the final pronoun:
I've also included the two other compounds of Bavat appearing in MW as words to be declined like Bavat, since they appear similar in sense to atraBavat an tatraBavat:
The MW entry : priya—viśva mfn., Pāṇ. 1-1, 29 Sch.
Here is a reference from sanskritdictionary.com,
which is summarized as:
The Words sarva &c., are not sarvanāma when occurring in a bahuvrīhi compound.
Katre gives the example: priya-viSva (beloved of all) has the dative singular form priya-viSvAya as against priya-viSvasmE.
The implication is that:
The further implication is that this kind of analysis is required for ALL pronominal compounds. For example, I speculate that the reason that Apte calls anyonya , etc. pronominal is because they are analyzed as a bahuvrIhi compounds. And similarly for why Kale says that atraBavat and tatraBavat are declined as the pronoun BAvat.
Continuing with this line of reasoning, it would seem that any of the pronominal compounds appearing as entries in MW must be analyzed to determine whether the compound is of the bahuvrIhi type; if it IS bahuvrIhi compound, then it should be declined according to deva, etc. if it IS NOT bahuvrIhi compound, then it should be declined as a pronoun.
My knowledge of compound analysis is insufficient to make this distinction reliably. In case others more knowledegable want to do some of this analysis, the following lists show all the compounds in MW which are compounds of anya, sarva and viSva.
If others can so determine which should be pronominally declined, I'll change their classification in lexnorm-all so the pronominal declensions will be generated. Currently, all of these listed below are declined as adjectives (or nouns) ending in a
अनन्य is बहुव्रीहिः in
भक्त्या तु अनन्या (गीता 11'54) - (1) न अन्यः यस्यै सा अनन्या भक्तिः (चतुर्थी-बहुव्रीहिः) अथवा न अन्यः यस्यां सा अनन्या भक्तिः (सप्तमी-बहुव्रीहिः)
अनन्यचेताः (8'14) - (1) न अन्यत् यस्मै तत् अनन्यम् (2) अनन्यं चेतः यस्य सः अनन्यचेताः
अनन्याः चिन्तयन्तः माम् (गीता 9'22) -न अन्यत् यस्मै सः अनन्यः (चतुर्थी-बहुव्रीहिः) अथवा न अन्यः यस्मात् सः अनन्यः (पञ्चमी-बहुव्रीहिः)
तदन्यः - तस्मात् अन्यः (पञ्चमी-तत्पुरुषः)
त्वदन्यः - त्वत्तः अन्यः (पञ्चमी-तत्पुरुषः) त्वदन्यः संशयस्यास्य छेत्ता न ह्युपपद्यते (गीता 6'39)
द्व्यन्यौ / द्व्यन्ये - द्वौ अन्यौ (पुँ.) द्वे अन्ये (नपुं. / स्त्री.) द्विगु
भवदन्यः भवतः अन्यः (पञ्चमी-तत्पुरुषः) यथा तदन्यः, त्वदन्यः मदन्यः
अतिसर्वम् - अतिशयं सर्वम् (केवलान्वितः कर्मधारयः)
असर्वम् - न सर्वम् (नञ्-तत्पुरुषः)
जगत् सर्वम् - व्यासोच्छिष्टं जगत् सर्वम् = सर्वं जगत् व्यासोच्छिष्टम् => सर्वम् च जगत् च स्वतन्त्रौ शब्दौ | सर्वम् विशेषणम् जगत् विशेष्यम् |
सुसर्वम् - निःशेषं सर्वमिति सुष्ठु सर्वम् तदेव सुसर्वम् (उपपद-तत्पुरुषः) ?
स्वसर्वम् - स्वस्य सर्वम् (षष्ठी-तत्पुरुषः) यत् स्वसर्वम् तत् सर्वस्वमपि (!)
अतिविश्वम् - विश्वादतीति अतिविश्वम् (पञ्चमी-तत्पुरुषः) | दृश्यताम् "विश्व"-शब्दः न सर्वदा सर्वनाम |
अनुविश्वम् - विश्वम् अनु इति अनुविश्वम् (केवल-समासः ?) यथा विश्वं तथा |
अविश्वम् - न विश्वम् इति अविश्वम् (नञ्-तत्पुरुषः)
"अ"-इत्यस्य उपपदस्य षण्णञर्थाः - तत्सादृश्यं तदभावश्च तदन्यत्वं तदल्पता | अप्राशस्त्यं विरोधश्च नञर्थाः षट् प्रकीर्तिताः
प्रतिविश्वम् -
विश्वं प्रतीति प्रतिविश्वम् |
दृश्यताम् श्रीगणपत्यथर्वशीर्षे ".. सर्वं जगदिदं त्वयि लयमेष्यति | सर्वं जगदिदं त्वयि प्रत्येति | ..."
विश्वं प्रतिभातीति प्रतिविश्वम्
यथा एतद्विश्वम् तथैव यदन्यद्विश्वं तत् प्रतिविश्वम् | यथा विश्वामित्रस्य प्रतिसृष्टिः |
प्रियविश्वः -
प्रियं विश्वं यस्मै सः प्रियविश्वः (बहुव्रीहिः)
प्रियः विश्वस्मै इति प्रियविश्वः (??) किं न विश्वस्मै प्रियः इति विश्वप्रियः ?
विश्वविश्वम् - विश्वस्य विश्वमिति विश्वविश्वम् | यथा "त्वमेव सर्वं मम देवदेव"- इत्यत्र देवानां देवः इति देवदेवः => तं सम्बुध्य "हे देवदेव !"
सर्वविश्वः -
सर्वं विश्वं येन सः सर्वविश्वः (बहुव्रीहिः)|
सर्वस्मिन्स विश्वे यः सः सर्वविश्वः (बहुव्रीहिः)
सर्वं विश्वं (व्याप्नोतीति) सर्वविश्वः (विग्रहपदलोपी बहुव्रीहिः)|
विष्णुसहस्रनामस्तोत्रे विश्व-शब्दान्वितानि अनेकानि नामानि => विश्वम् विश्वकर्मा विश्वरेताः विश्वयोनिः विश्वात्मा विश्वबाहुः विश्वदक्षिणः विश्वमूर्तिः |
Source: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/bvparishat/HNsgwTYnd_U
Although there are only a few pronouns (35 according to one enumeration, the sarvAdi gaRa), I find it difficult to 'make sense' of the declension of these commonly used words. In this presentation, I generally follow the presentation of Kale (pages 87-100); but have also referenced the grammars of Bucknell and Deshpande, and the online material of Huet.
Here is the 'main' list of words that are declined according to the pronoun models; these model names are m_pron, f_pron, n_pron. A brief mention of the English 'sense' of the words is given. Also the model genders are stated. Spellings are in SLP1 transliteration.
They are grouped into subcategories according to the logic of the current declension algorithm:
idiosnycratic declension
These declensions are not derived by a process of combining a base with endings, but are taken as given.
Pronominal adjectives like anya
Kale describes these as being declined 'like yad', Kale section 147.
pronominal adjectives like sarva
Declensions are like the anya declensions, except for the Neuter, and only in the Nominative Singular, Accusative singular (and Vocative singular).
like sarva, but with variations
Following Kale, these variations occur only in the masculine, and then in one or more of the Nominative plural, Ablative singular, Locative singular.
Note: Bucknell states:
Our declensions for these words follow the more restrictive rule per our understanding of Kale.
eka and dvi
These are mentioned among the pronouns (in sarvAdi gaRa); they are also the first two cardinals numbers. Our treatment only considers the declension with models m_card, etc.
compounds ending in pronouns
There are several entries in MW which are compounds whose final pada is one of the pronouns mentioned above. However, only the following few are, in our declensions, flagged as being declined as pronouns.
The reason for current exclusion of other such pronoun-ending compounds from being declined like pronouns will be discussed in a later comment.