Closed garrythezany closed 3 years ago
i haven't looked too deeply into it, but it seems mostly fine. when you fixed the tests, please also add some that test the validity (both positive and negative) of the job name patterns, in particular regarding the dots.
notes to self:
Hello!
I fixed / added lines to the tests as desired, but I wasn't possible for me to force the monkeypatch
to actively set the JOB_NAME_REGEX
in another test - now the total cover is <90% and I won't have the time to fix this (I'm not reeaaally a python-dev).
Thanks for your time!
Garret
okay, i figured that testing for regex patterns that would allow dots isn't possible concisely. please watch this repo and handle all issues that stem from a misconfiguration of job name patterns! ;-)
These changes have been merged as 05072fe9c71038468d16870d0020e924dbc3dff2 and 8891a586f79f8ae18ac8e850cb3f9c89a02dc17f.
Hello again!
As suggested, I've closed the old pull-request. Excuse me for the long delay but finally I found the time to wrap it up, hopefully now is everything as desired.
To answer your question, I'd say I'm working in the hosting sector. :)
And again thanks for your time!
Garret