Currently it seems to behave the same as cursorUpLine() / cursorUpLine(1). Obviously I can omit the call when the value is zero, but when doing math sometimes the value is zero and it's far easier to have the conditional inside of cursorUpLine rather than enclosing each occurrence in user code.
Currently it seems to behave the same as
cursorUpLine()
/cursorUpLine(1)
. Obviously I can omit the call when the value is zero, but when doing math sometimes the value is zero and it's far easier to have the conditional inside ofcursorUpLine
rather than enclosing each occurrence in user code.