Closed fvsch closed 8 years ago
I’m not sure there is any point in doing that:
kirby
and site
folders at least), so it doesn’t make things more lightweight for deployment or lessens the technical requirements..htaccess
config is broken, the static HTML files won’t be served either, so it doesn’t help with that.I can see it helping if you want to serve a 99% static website, and have just one or two routes that are dynamic. Then you could write a .htaccess
that calls Kirby’s index.php
for very specific routes.
If someone wants to suggest a convention — more than the exact implementation — that could make it work and be easy enough to understand for Kirby users, I might consider it.
Yes my question was a bit silly. The cache is almost as fast and should make no noticeable difference for visitors in most cases.
Closing since I’m not really interested in doing that in the future, and I’d like to only keep the "yes" or "maybe" issues open.
From: https://forum.getkirby.com/t/staticbuilder-kirby-as-a-static-site-generator/4084/2