search

fxe025 / pe

0 stars 0 forks source link

No eligibility check #5

Open fxe025 opened 2 months ago

fxe025 commented 2 months ago 
_____________________________________________________________
CEG Study Plan for: Fu Xueer
_____________________________________________________________
| Y1S1 [Sem 1] | Y1S2 [Sem 2] | Y2S1 [Sem 3] | Y2S2 [Sem 4] |
|ES2631        |              |CG1111A       |              |
|CS1010        |              |LAJ1201       |              |
|GEA1000       |              |LAJ2201       |              |
|DTK1234       |              |LAJ2202       |              |
|EG1311        |              |
  |              |
|IE2141        |              |
  |              |
|EE2211        |              |
  |              |
|CDE2501       |              |
  |              |
|CDE2000       |              |
  |              |
|PF1101        |              |
  |              |
|CP3880        |              |
  |              |
|CS2040C       |              |
  |              |
_____________________________________________________________
| Y3S1 [Sem 5] | Y3S2 [Sem 6] | Y4S1 [Sem 7] | Y4S2 [Sem 8] |
_____________________________________________________________
- Current Study: Semester 8
- Total MCs taken: 72.00 / 160
- Total MCs listed: 72.00 / 160
_____________________________________________________________

LAJ1201 (Japanese 1) is a prerequisite to LAJ2201 (Japanese 2) , which is a prerequisite to LAJ2202 (Japanese 3). I shouldn't be able to take all of them in one semester

nus-se-bot commented 2 months ago

Team's Response

The idea of prerequisite is a good feature to have but it is not in the scope of our product as our product gives the user the flexibility to choose the modules they want to add into their planner. It has also been mentioned that user must be aware of what the prerequisites of the modules they are adding as the program does not check it for you as seen in the screenshot below.

image.png

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue response

Team chose [response.NotInScope]

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]

## :question: Issue severity Team chose [`severity.VeryLow`] Originally [`severity.Low`] - [ ] I disagree **Reason for disagreement:** [replace this with your explanation]