Closed drhodrid closed 6 months ago
Ah yeah I probably should put an assert in to make sure that it's only on the right function spaces
I mean it was also a silly mistake on my part, but probably good to get an assert in, just to be safe!!
Professor (Computational & Observational Geodynamics) Associate Director Research & Engagement Research School of Earth Sciences, The Australian National University, Mills Road, Acton, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia
On 8 Apr 2024, at 10:00 AM, Will Scott @.***> wrote:
Ah yeah I probably should put an assert in to make sure that it's only on the right function spaces
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/g-adopt/g-adopt/issues/62#issuecomment-2041652915, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB25UKSM4IZ5VRADF4ELRUDY4HMZDAVCNFSM6AAAAABFWN4LMOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDANBRGY2TEOJRGU. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
I recently (accidentally) ran a case with a DG approach for the energy solve, but forgot to remove the su_advection = True flag. I'm unsure what this would've done (!), but it's probably wise to add some sort of options check to ensure that others don't make the same mistake. Thoughts?