When assigning a set to a signal/variable, the contents "inside" the set are not aligned properly. Here is an example original code.
architecture behaviour of A_ARITH_MOD is
signal sOperandInStatus : data_status_vector((S_ALU_INPUTS - 1) downto 0) := (others => INIT_DATA);
begin
-- Output connections
main : process
begin
sStatusOut <= (2 => DR_ONE, 5 => DR_ZERO, 7 => DR_ONE, others => DR_EMPTY);
sStatusIn <= (32 => DR_ONE, 56 => DR_ZERO, 17 => DR_ONE, 5 => DR_ZERO, 7 => DR_ONE, others => DR_EMPTY);
localStatusRegister := (9 => DR_ONE, 13 => DR_ONE, others => DR_ZERO);
sResultOut <= (others => (others => DR_EMPTY));
end process main;
end architecture behaviour;
gets formatted to
architecture behaviour of A_ARITH_MOD is
signal sOperandInStatus : data_status_vector((S_ALU_INPUTS - 1) downto 0) := (others => INIT_DATA);
begin
-- Output connections
main : process
begin
sStatusOut <= (2 => DR_ONE, 5 => DR_ZERO, 7 => DR_ONE, others => DR_EMPTY);
sStatusIn <= (32 => DR_ONE, 56 => DR_ZERO, 17 => DR_ONE, 5 => DR_ZERO, 7 => DR_ONE, others => DR_EMPTY);
localStatusRegister := (9 => DR_ONE, 13 => DR_ONE, others => DR_ZERO);
sResultOut <= (others => (others => DR_EMPTY));
end process main;
end architecture behaviour;
The issue is the long space after 2 and 32. I see no valid reason for it to be there.
A good idea to fix the issue is to treat the set separately.
So the set spacing may look like this after it is formatted:
(32 => DR_ONE, 56 => DR_ZERO, 17 => DR_ONE, 5 => DR_ZERO, 7 => DR_ONE, others => DR_EMPTY)
However the common assignemnt signs ( "<=" or ":=" ) as well as the starting set braket "(" of sequential statements can be alligned. (This is implemented already by the looks of it).
I hope this makes sense. Let me know if more details are needed.
When assigning a set to a signal/variable, the contents "inside" the set are not aligned properly. Here is an example original code.
gets formatted to
The issue is the long space after 2 and 32. I see no valid reason for it to be there. A good idea to fix the issue is to treat the set separately.
So the set spacing may look like this after it is formatted:
(32 => DR_ONE, 56 => DR_ZERO, 17 => DR_ONE, 5 => DR_ZERO, 7 => DR_ONE, others => DR_EMPTY)
However the common assignemnt signs ( "<=" or ":=" ) as well as the starting set braket "(" of sequential statements can be alligned. (This is implemented already by the looks of it).I hope this makes sense. Let me know if more details are needed.