Closed ryotayamanaka closed 8 months ago
Similar to the "blank node" in the RDF world?
a -> b :has
b -> b1
b -> b2
b -> b3
Is this (explicitly) allowed/disallowed in the current PG syntax spec? @hchiba1
It is not treated at the PEG level. We could explicitly allow/disallow at the application level. It is a good idea to complement implicit nodes after parsing.
followed by the discussion: https://github.com/orgs/pg-format/discussions/16
Is it ok to have one line as below?
instead of: