Closed MicFin closed 7 years ago
Does a solution branch make sense here? I only ask because this add solution doesn't seem to be adding an actual solution. Wouldn't the solution have to include differing commits that change the story?
I see what you mean. It could be improved. The solution branch includes a folder and two files: /game-of-gits
, game-of-gits/sad-tale.md
and game-of-gits/the-stark-bunch.md
.
https://github.com/ga-wdi-boston/git#code-along-making-a-local-repository
game-of-gits
sad-tale.md
and add text to it.https://github.com/ga-wdi-boston/git#removing-now-we-need-to-remove-files-previously-added
game-of-gits/the-stark-bunch.md
The developers delete the game-of-gits/the-stark-bunch.md
and add other text to and then remove it from the game-of-gits/sad-tale.md
but it seems like including those files in a solution branch would be ok.
I am fine with the solution as is, with added commits, or no solution as it was.
Great clarification Mike! And as you said, we previously had no solution branch at all (there is a solution but it's 2yrs old and is not in line master's diagnostic. AFAIK All repos are being updated with a solution branch no matter what, per process. I'll check with a lead before pushing this, as I don't want to stomp that history blindly.
@payne-chris-r merge into the existing solution? or rename this solution and force push?
Woah. This solution looks old. I think the lm01/solution
branch looks more accurate given what @MicFin has said. @gaand @jrhorn424 do you know more about this history than I? Is it ok to wax the old solution? Should we archive it? Process for archiving (if necessary)?
Please do not wax it. @payne-chris-r Instead, rename it archive/solution
for now. I'll take care of moving it to attic, eventually.
Moved to archive/solution
Do not merge with master. Create solution branch.