Closed sdelatorrep closed 3 years ago
@sdelatorrep @jrambla @silverdaz Generally agree, but some comments on the format:
id
and text as label
count
, to deliver some information about the number of potentially matched samples...filteringTerms
or filters
... instead ontologyTerms
, since custom filters etc. go beyond ontology classes.I'm modelling this now for Beacon+ - examples (the custom icdom
filter is not prefixed but internally structured):
{
"id": "NCIT:C126594",
"label": "Follicular Variant Thyroid Gland Papillary Carcinoma",
"source": "National Cancer Institute Thesaurus",
"count": 112
},
{
"id": "icdom-85003",
"label": "Infiltrating duct carcinoma, NOS",
"source": "ICD-O 3 Morphologies (Progenetix)",
"count": 9754,
},
The endpoint should allow for definition of
PMID
) - and this doesn't include customs like age groups etc.Live examples (can be modified upon feedback):
Here, only in the last example sample counts per filter are being provided (dataset specific).
WDYT, @sdelatorrep ?
Closing as it is duplicated by #30.
This endpoint should describe what ontology terms or custom dictionaries are implemented in this Beacon. Something similar to: