Open mbrush opened 3 weeks ago
would it be meaningful to capitalize Variation here as well?
@mbrush Thanks for catching that. Yes, that's wrong in exactly the way you describe. I'll fix it.
would it be meaningful to capitalize Variation here as well?
uh.... yes iff gks:core/json/IRI objects are all of the same vrs:Variation
class as well, which I think is the case. @ahwagner is that right, that all gkscore:IRI objects are ultimately vrs:Variation
s?
Yes, please change and create a PR
The
description
of theCategoricalVariation.members
property reads: "A non-exhaustive list of VRS variation Constraints that satisfy the constraints of this categorical variant." . . . the first 'Constraints' in this definition seems wrong. See here.Shouldn't the description read "A non-exhaustive list of VRS variations that satisfy the constraints of this categorical variant" . . . or am I not understanding something?