Closed mbaudis closed 7 years ago
Awesome @mbaudis! Looking forward to working with this in practice. Being able to easily interpret the type of the variant always seemed a useful canonical field to me! What do you think of making the type an enumeration as opposed to a string?
@david4096 I am neutral regarding enum vs. string; both need some way to document permitted values. This is mostly a schema design decision (we've been going back and forth, with the first version having enums, then those being discouraged ...).
For the code integration team to edit/decide (so go ahead ...).
Closed in favor of https://github.com/ga4gh/schemas/pull/827
This is a first attempt to address the need for representation of structural variants. It is chiefly aimed to encode sequence duplications/deletions, and follows examples from VCFv4.2. The first commit does not yet implement the services part or documentation.
For some of the discussions, please see issue https://github.com/ga4gh/schemas/issues/752 .