Closed cmungall closed 2 years ago
@cmungall I don't think you're right here. The inverse would be "isGreatGrandparentOf", but this is has.
Both make sense:
Annie isGreatGrandchildOf Erasmus
Annie hasGreatGrandparent Erasmus
Doh, You're right! Somehow I missed the switch from child/parent in the label
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 6:54 PM Jim Balhoff @.***> wrote:
@cmungall https://github.com/cmungall I don't think you're right here. The inverse would be "isGreatGrandparentOf", but this is has.
Both make sense:
- Annie isGreatGrandchildOf Erasmus
- Annie hasGreatGrandparent Erasmus
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/GA4GH-Pedigree-Standard/family_history_terminology/issues/32#issuecomment-1295684475, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAMMOLZ7Q7E74IRTEG5RNDWFR7WVANCNFSM5227SAUQ . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: <GA4GH-Pedigree-Standard/family_history_terminology/issues/32/1295684475@ github.com>
altLabel should be used for alternative labels/synonyms/aliases
This would make this wrong:
isGreatGrandchildOf skos:altLabel "hasGreatGrandparent"^^rdfs:Literal
the altlabel is actually for the inverse. Either name the inverse and make this string a property of that, or use a different annotation property such as antonymOf