Going through the schema and implementing a remote interface for funnel, all of the field names are so concise and elegant that these three field names stuck out.
I am proposing three changes:
image_name --> image
Most of the other fields throughout the schema are single names, and the word image does not need to be disambiguated with any other fields in the schema, so this seems like the natural choice.
cmd --> command
The schema is refreshingly light on abbreviated names to the point where this one stands out. Why not just command?
environ --> env
This one is funny because it is really just a different abbreviation of environment. I would almost prefer environment since it is nice to be clear, but we have such a long-standing tradition of using the three letters ENV to stand for the environment (even the bash program called env) that I think this one makes sense.
Going through the schema and implementing a remote interface for funnel, all of the field names are so concise and elegant that these three field names stuck out.
I am proposing three changes:
Most of the other fields throughout the schema are single names, and the word
image
does not need to be disambiguated with any other fields in the schema, so this seems like the natural choice.The schema is refreshingly light on abbreviated names to the point where this one stands out. Why not just
command
?This one is funny because it is really just a different abbreviation of
environment
. I would almost preferenvironment
since it is nice to be clear, but we have such a long-standing tradition of using the three letters ENV to stand for the environment (even the bash program calledenv
) that I think this one makes sense.Open to all thoughts and ideas on this.