search

gabrieldoty / simplify-scorm

Scorm 1.2 Javascript API
MIT License
230 stars 77 forks source link

Scorm 2004 #1

Closed gregdeluxee closed 6 years ago

gregdeluxee commented 7 years ago

Hi,

First, thank you very much for this scorm 1.2 run time implementation! It works really well and really simple to include to an existing LMS.

I would like to know if you worked on a version that works with the scorm 2004 version?

By the way, did you make all of the code by your own or have you been inspired by other code? It could help me to build a run time for scorm 2004.

Thank you in advance for your answer, Greg

gabrieldoty commented 7 years ago

Hi Greg, thanks for the feedback!

I have not worked on a version yet for Scorm 2004, but if there was interest in it - I would be happy to take a look at it.

The code is all mine and just based on the Scorm 1.2 reference guide here: https://scorm.com/scorm-explained/technical-scorm/run-time/run-time-reference/

~Gabe

On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 10:49 AM, gregdeluxee notifications@github.com wrote:

Hi,

First, thank you very much for this scorm 1.2 run time implementation! It works really well and really simple to include to an existing LMS.

I would like to know if you worked on a version that works with the scorm 2004 version?

By the way, did you make all of the code by your own or have you been inspired by other code? It could help me to build a run time for scorm 2004.

Thank you in advance for your answer, Greg

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/gabrieldoty/simplify-scorm/issues/1, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHjUCOMuJ-mK-NRE9hJUdHLcfQgErtpkks5r_s97gaJpZM4NtF3m .

gregdeluxee commented 7 years ago

Hi,

Thanks for your fast feedback :D

Did you take a lot of time to built it ?

I thought about maybe adapting your scorm api to fit it for scorm 2004 run time reference... As you have a good experience about it, do you think it would be a good idea ?

Thanks again ! Greg

gabrieldoty commented 7 years ago

Feel free to make a fork of it for Scorm 2004 - the engine took me a few weeks to build and test, I would imagine porting it over to Scorm 2004 would probably be a much easier process

~Gabe

On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 10:56 AM, gregdeluxee notifications@github.com wrote:

Hi,

Thanks for your fast feedback :D

Did you take a lot of time to built it ?

I thought about maybe adapting your scorm api to fit it for scorm 2004 run time reference... As you have a good experience about it, do you think it would be a good idea ?

Thanks again ! Greg

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/gabrieldoty/simplify-scorm/issues/1#issuecomment-305519221, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHjUCAkYHgobnAHg3Au87f-vRiQCTfp6ks5r_tENgaJpZM4NtF3m .

gregdeluxee commented 7 years ago

Thanks for the info.

For the moment I'll keep focus on scorm 1.2 but if I start any development for scorm 2004 I let you know ;)

Greg

gabrieldoty commented 6 years ago

closing, will re-open if plans to extend to 2004