Closed jmcclena closed 2 years ago
@jmcclena do you understand why certain coils can't be retrieved from MDS+? To me this sounds like we are ousing the wrong mhdin.dat
... in other words, if there are only 15 coils in MDS+, then we should be looking for 15, not 18 like we are doing now.
@jmcclena do you understand why certain coils can't be retrieved from MDS+? To me this sounds like we are ousing the wrong mhdin.dat
... in other words, if there are only 15 coils in MDS+, then we should be looking for 15, not 18 like we are doing now.
Hmmm... if looks like the signals do not exist below discharge:133139
I don't think the issue is with the data fetching code itself. The question is: why are we looking for 18 signals when there are only 15 available? are we using the right signals.dat/mhdin.dat files?
@jmcclena doesn't like this approach.
Superceded by work in #193
@orso82 This is a branch for testing a fix for fixing issue https://github.com/gafusion/OMFIT-source/issues/6061 by adding in dummy values if mds+ can't be connected to. As validity doesn't exist for pf_active signals, what do you think is the best way to implement some pass if certain coils can't be retrieved from mds+.