search

gagoel / freebase-site

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/freebase-site
0 stars 0 forks source link

Extend Suggest to allow an advanced dialog option or tab #27

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Extend Suggest to provide an advanced dialog option or tab to allow exact match 
on a topic name.  (Other community members feel free to add additional comments 
on your own particular needs)

Original issue reported on code.google.com by thadguidry on 16 Nov 2010 at 4:27

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
We might be able to implement exact matching by surrounding the query with 
quotes - would that work ?

Original comment by masou...@google.com on 16 Nov 2010 at 7:52

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
How would you feel about having an "advanced" link that basically opens up a 
mini queryeditor inside the dropdown?

Attached screenshots.

Thoughts?

Original comment by daep...@google.com on 19 Nov 2010 at 12:16

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Very cool!  But, I would categorize the mini queryeditor as an "advanced" 
"advanced" option.  There is still a passionate need for expressing just the 
basic limiters that are available in the Search API itself, with thinking about 
MQL or the use of mql_filter.  Which I mentioned on the email thread and recap 
now: 1. exact match against topic name 2. exact match against topic name that 
includes alias name (hmm, do we need an exclude also?)  If we had facets like 
we do in Google Refine...well, the world of Freebase search would be a much 
better place !  You'll get there... this is a great start.

Original comment by thadguidry on 19 Nov 2010 at 2:27

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
It would be nice to have a few "generic" tabs/facets to the right of the input 
box that provide a MQL instant example for commonly used things like I 
mentioned above.  Exact match on topic, exact not including aliases, etc...  
that would be phenomenal...then I wouldn't have to even think about MQL..and 
the community could just make suggestions to add them to that "Special filters" 
Example page that is shown when the user clicks on the tab... similar to how we 
already have examples in Query Editor now !  Awesome ideas guys !

Original comment by thadguidry on 19 Nov 2010 at 2:33

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
We are leaning towards something like the attached screen shots. Will these two 
options be sufficient for your use case?

Original comment by daep...@google.com on 23 Nov 2010 at 1:16

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
No we have to 3 options:
1. Exact match on name
2. Exact match on name or alias
3. Custom MQL

Why ?  Try this simple word "black"
You get the continent of Africa because someone typed in an alias (and it 
probably shouldn't really be returned as a result, it's Africa, not African.  
Aliases are great, but we have to be able to exclude them as well, it's a 2nd 
requirement to have a name only match.  So let's get all 3 options available.  
And probably perhaps make the text & checkboxes the same text size as results.  
Finally, I would prefill the Custom MQL option like you have when user clicks 
it (don't make it simply blank with a Json wrapper)  The id: & name: at a 
minimum.  Great job guys, your flying high and reaching the stars!

Original comment by thadguidry on 23 Nov 2010 at 3:04

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
OH, one more thing... will the options be a callable preference ?  So let's say 
that someone like me using Refine and integrates Suggest, would like to have 
the preference locked. And Refine could pass the preference to Suggest ?  Not 
sure how that would work, but you get the idea.  If I'm spending 4 hours in 
Refine and only working with scientific data, then I'm going to use Exact match 
on name, over and over and wouldn't want to click on it each time but somehow 
tell Refine to tell Suggest to keep the option checked.  Or my custom MQL for 
that matter.

Original comment by thadguidry on 23 Nov 2010 at 3:08

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
@thadguidry:

We're going through a full design review of this feature, so rest assured the 
visual design will be cleaned up and consistent with the UI. However, right now 
the focus is on how to integrate this feature seamlessly into the UI with 
minimal intrusion. For example, changing the markup structure of suggest is 
non-trivial for compatibility reasons, so we have to look at how we can add 
this feature without changing this dramatically (and making sure the CSS works 
with or without this turned on). As well, the "advanced" link is currently in 
the "status" bar, which itself is an optional parameter. What happens if a user 
calls the "advanced" parameter, but has "status" set to false? For that reason, 
it may make more sense to add the "advanced" toggle to the bottom bar, next to 
the "more" link, which is generally a more stable element (but isn't available 
until a user has typed something). We'll sort it out, this is just the usual 
process we go through with these features—we're just trying to do it more in 
the open now ;-)

Original comment by kconra...@google.com on 23 Nov 2010 at 3:34

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Glad to hear that.  And so it's non-trivial for compatibility reasons for those 
customer using Suggest out there on their sites ?  Is that what you mean ?  The 
rest of your response I understood and is throughly logical.

Original comment by thadguidry on 23 Nov 2010 at 4:10

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Yes, there are people using suggest on their sites, some with custom styling, 
etc. Obviously, they can stick with an older version if necessary, but we'd 
like to make updates as painless (and compelling) as possible. We want to keep 
freebase-suggest a relatively lightweight plugin, so we're trying to avoid 
bloated markup as much as possible (especially as this is a fairly "advanced" 
feature).

Original comment by kconra...@google.com on 23 Nov 2010 at 4:28

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Then why not just copy it's code and make a Freebase-site Suggest2 that has the 
advanced features to use on the Freebase site, or within other power tools like 
Refine or Acre apps that care to use Suggest2 advanced features.  And keep 
Suggest1 as it is a lightweight plugin.  My idea is that there are 2 user 
groups here.. one needing advanced features and the other not.

Original comment by thadguidry on 23 Nov 2010 at 4:34

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
@kconragan - We could treat the status bar like a header element that appears 
if either status or advanced is set to true.

@thadguidry - I wasn't seeing that much difference between just the name query 
and the name/alias query, since the name/alias query needs to be separate "or" 
queries and as a first pass was just concatenating the two results, therefore 
the first 100 results are the same as just the name query.

The advanced features should be configurable at initialization but this does 
beg the question of whether or not these parameters can be modified by the user 
even though the page that initialized it may NOT want you to. Also, if you 
bring up the web inspector/firebug, you can theoretically call suggest on the 
input again with your own parameters which may allow a greasemonkey script that 
re-initializes suggest with your own advanced parameters.

Original comment by daep...@google.com on 23 Nov 2010 at 6:00

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
If suggest was initialized with a type and mql_filter param, would you expect 
the exact name match and the custom mql option to use those parameters?

For example, if suggest was instantiated with:

$(input).suggest({
  type: ["/sports/pro_athlete", "/people/deceased_person"], 
  mql_filter: [{"/people/person/date_of_birth": "1900"}]
});

Do we apply these constraints to the exact name/alias match and custom mql 
queries?

Original comment by daep...@google.com on 23 Nov 2010 at 6:21

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Also, I wonder if there should be a MACRO-like feature for the custom mql 
option so that a special variable will be replaced with what's in the input 
field? This is like the "Variables" tab in queryeditor. Thoughts?

Original comment by daep...@google.com on 23 Nov 2010 at 6:25

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
^ So if I have this:

[{
  id: null,
  name: "$INPUT",
  type: "/film/film"
}]

$INPUT will be replaced with the input value

Original comment by daep...@google.com on 23 Nov 2010 at 6:33

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Hmm, Remembering the instantiation of a type & a mql_filter might be something 
useful.  Although those instantiation options could prove useful to others like 
Gordan.  It's basically this:  We have recon services and search services... we 
give them a few parameters and can get results... WHOA !  too many results for 
me! hurts my eyes and some of these results need to be filtered out completely. 
 So, we filter or limit those even more, by name, alias, or some custom 
mql_filter code.  The mql_filter code should be an instantiation option, I 
would think, and type would be useful as well.  I could see Matchmaker getting 
better with those available to it.  Regarding you direct question if we should 
apply type and ml_filter constraints to exact name/alias match : Not always, 
but the ability would be nice.  Regarding applying those constraints to custom 
mql queries...eh, that's probably going overboard and into the realm of a 
custom custom Suggest.  Check with Gordon and perhaps Jon who uses Refine for 
loading and Reconciliation, I'd like their opinion here also before we get 
further.

Original comment by thadguidry on 23 Nov 2010 at 6:42

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Regarding the special variable,  Yeah, I like that $INPUT

Original comment by thadguidry on 23 Nov 2010 at 6:47

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
The latest mock and prototype can be found here:

http://sandbox.freebaseapps.com/advanced_suggest

Original comment by daep...@google.com on 29 Nov 2010 at 9:22

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Great progress! I worry that this will only be used by the experts who know 
their MQL very comfortably as it is implemented currently. I assume we will 
have helpful examples for common issues like removing all results of a type 
/book/book_edition if I don't know what type I am looking for? 

ANother question: How will we get the advance MQL filter back to the default 
state?

Original comment by gmack...@google.com on 30 Nov 2010 at 6:51

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
You can now save your custom mql queries.

http://sandbox.freebaseapps.com/advanced_suggest

For starters, it's just using localStorage so your queries won't be
available across domains.

Try it out and let us know what you think.

Original comment by daep...@google.com on 3 Dec 2010 at 2:12

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Dae, that's RICH !  Very nice. One use case I had: 
http://awesomescreenshot.com/05846xacc

Original comment by thadguidry on 3 Dec 2010 at 2:30

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Can we make Clear All always display on the advanced interface(at least when 
this gets up to Production).  Right now it only shows when I hover, and I don't 
see the usefulness with that effect for the Clear All feature.  That's a 
feature a user show always know about without hovering.

Original comment by thadguidry on 3 Dec 2010 at 2:35

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
^^ done

Original comment by daep...@google.com on 3 Dec 2010 at 2:59

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
What's the status on this so far ?  Can we expect this functionality in the 
next 2 months ? Or do you think it will be longer than that because of Google 
infrastructure migration ?

Original comment by thadguidry on 10 Jan 2011 at 8:53