I want to use the new batch upload API. It's way faster and the result is much more human friendly. But we are stuck using the --legacy API, because if you run without the --legacy flag, then it creates a duplicate data library.
Having a period of time with a duplicate (or with no) data library is not ideal.
Could the batch upload API update a data library rather than producing a new data lib?
Otherwise, could we get the nicer short names in the --legacy api?
and
behave quite differently.
I want to use the new batch upload API. It's way faster and the result is much more human friendly. But we are stuck using the
--legacy
API, because if you run without the--legacy
flag, then it creates a duplicate data library.Having a period of time with a duplicate (or with no) data library is not ideal.
--legacy
api?