Open bgruening opened 1 year ago
you've fixed the cgroup data we were getting? That's exciting to hear. How did that happen? Last time I looked at it some of the cgroup data was a bit suspect, to say the least.
Nope, not fixed I think, they are still very flaky. But here we only need runtimes. An estimate of 1h+ is enough I would say to rank a few tools top. I suspect all the galaxy_sequence_utils popping up top, or some small python/perl scripts ... groomer etc ... hopefully ... those would be also low-hanging fruits to make them faster.
damn, I was hopeful. Makes sense, good luck!
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023, 00:00 Björn Grüning, @.***> wrote:
Nope, not fixed I think, they are still very flaky. But here we only need runtimes. An estimate of 1h+ is enough I would say to rank a few tools top. I suspect all the galaxy_sequence_utils popping up top, or some small python/perl scripts ... groomer etc ... hopefully ... those would be also low-hanging fruits to make them faster.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/galaxyproject/gxadmin/issues/126#issuecomment-1428821159, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADP7O6EP6ZXWMXHA7D6TFLWXK4IRANCNFSM6AAAAAAUZK277Y . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>
I would like to start optimizing some tools. I think we can find some BA and MA students to optimize our tool stack and with that waste fewer resources.
To prepare a query like
gxadmin query tool-usage
but with a min/avg/max runtime column would be super useful.