Open natefoo opened 10 months ago
@natefoo did you had a look at good-for-pulsar
. Should we rename this one to fit into your naming schema and be a bit more explicit about what it does :) Should we harmonize here?
Ah thanks for the heads up, looks useful - although that is input-size-to-runtime, but they could certainly be combined.
or we rename good-for-pulsar
to tool-input-size-to-runtime
or something like that.
yes it's a good suggestion, please rename the pulsar function to match.
The whole time I was writing this I was like "I swear I already wrote this," but I looked through the existing queries and didn't see it.
Well... #78 :facepalm:
This is better than the other query IMO but needs a bit more work and to integrate the two of them.
Hoping to use this for insight on TPV rules, although tools I've looked at so far tend not to have super meaningful correlations :upside_down_face: