Closed natefoo closed 1 year ago
None of the tests override this name. Is there a reason you cannot just use the default manage name? Oh... is it a message queue thing?
I feel like the whole approach might be mistaken though... the problem is different destinations are using the same amqp queue names? I kind of the think of the manager in the coexecution scenario as named default and as the only manager - it isn't immediately clear why anyone would want to change that. Would the better approach here be to just key those on a different parameter?
I think this was superseded by https://github.com/galaxyproject/pulsar/issues/313#issuecomment-1424686260
Potentially fixes #313 but I haven't actually fully tested it, just verified that it resolves the exception. And it's not my favorite. @jmchilton?