Open giuspugl opened 1 year ago
Yes, a notebook is fine. Do we want to create Q and U maps and interpolate as we do in I?
Do you already have polarized radio galaxies maps in the websky release?
Do you already have polarized radio galaxies maps in the websky release?
maps can be found here https://portal.nersc.gov/project/sobs/users/Radio_WebSky/matched_maps/
Do we want to create Q and U maps and interpolate as we do in I?
i think we can do that, but i am concerned for the interpolation of Q and U if the polarization angle is random at different freq. @xzackli is the pol. angle frequency dependent, or is it chosen only at the reference frequency and then you simply scaled the Q and U fluxes according with the sampled SEDs ?
I need to generate a revised set of polarized maps. Actually, @giuspugl this is a good opportunity to make rg2 with a realization of bright sources.
@xzackli @giuspugl any news on this?
@xzackli @giuspugl any news on this?
Yes! we are on it!
the idea is to build rg2
from the PCCS2 catalog (the most sensitive was at 143 GHz channel, 177mJy). This would get rid of the too bright unonbserved sources present in rg1
https://github.com/CMB-S4/s4mapbasedsims/issues/23 .
rg1
. how does this plan sound ?
At the moment we 've completed task 2 and @xzackli is on task 3 and 4.
thanks @giuspugl, the plan looks great, it would be good to save the actual pipeline used and add it to the documentation of PySM or to the documentation of Websky
I just realized that
rg1
doesn't have polarization. although this goes into the direction of having a low complexity model, i think neglecting the blazar polarization is not realistic. I would propose anrg2
model where we can include the polarization as @xzackli and I did in the websky haloes. polarization is simulated assuming a random pol. angle and pol. frac. 2%( consistent with the latest observations). Is it something easy to include ? can provide a notebook if needed..