Closed AlexisDrogoul closed 5 years ago
I think i can do it during the camp ... But most of the models in Features have already these ones. So basically, I understand the need of "typical" syntax models. However, as we can see in the Syntaxe one, they could be interesting if they had a "context", and not simply be syntax models...
We might also add:
@chapuisk : We would need models illustrating benchmark
statement and facets.
Given all the previous commit, it seems that we address all the requierements! Feel free to reopen for new needs.
In the continuation of Issue #1549 (which I close as this one is more general), we should enhance the Syntax subfolder of the Library models and create models for little known aspects of the language itself:
loop
,ask
, implicit loops by scheduling agents, implicit loops with side effects in container operators)if
,switch/match
, conditions in reflexes, transition in states)agt.att
,agent[att]
,att of agent
and which attributes are present when loading shape files, for instance).It is always a pain to build such models, but I think they are necessary.