I'm a parent [and I'm its child attribute]
[I'm also its child attribute]
... but maybe it should't be. Revoking this rule would allow for attributes to follow the rules of indentation.
In this case, indentation rules would be more consistent:
Parent [child of Parent]
[also child of Parent]
[not child of Parent]
Plus, this would allow for attributes to not require their parents to be named items:
Blog Post
Blog post body text.
[pagebreak]
Related Articles
Article A
Article B
Article C
Notice how in the above example [pagebreak] isn't the child of Blog post body text. (that would be strange). Instead, it's a child of the assumed document parent item because it's indented as such. This is especially useful for converting to non-indent based markup languages like Markdown, where there really are some "nameless elements" (like a page break) that just belong to the page and not to the current section:
gamburg
commented
4 years ago
... but maybe it should't be. Revoking this rule would allow for attributes to follow the rules of indentation.
In this case, indentation rules would be more consistent:
Plus, this would allow for attributes to not require their parents to be named items:
Notice how in the above example
[pagebreak]isn't the child ofBlog post body text.(that would be strange). Instead, it's a child of the assumed document parent item because it's indented as such. This is especially useful for converting to non-indent based markup languages like Markdown, where there really are some "nameless elements" (like a page break) that just belong to the page and not to the current section: