Closed cainthebest closed 1 year ago
This is a very impressive rework! After a glance it looks like this is ready to replace the old bufferer, whats your thoughts on this? If there isn't much to say I could start working on it (as we discussed over the Discord server that I could make the transition).
Yeah it looks good to me as far as i have looked, Im happy to handover the PR to you
@CosminPerRam 1 thing though, do we keep with bufferer.rs
or rename to buffer.rs
. Its only internally used
We could rename it to buffer.
ngl this is going to need some more work than expected due to some functions take ownership of the buffer, causing it to go out of scope and be dropped, while a reference to the buffer's data is still needed within the current function's scope.
Ref: #27 Fix's: #26