Accompanying the addition of the GAMLSS class based on distributions3 in gamlss.dist I have added a prodist() method for gamlss objects here. This greatly facilitates the entire workflow as illustrated on the corresponding manual page ?prodist.gamlss.
As for gamlss.dist I have streamlined the DESCRIPTION a bit (adding myself as a contributor, and linking to GitHub for bug reports) and added a NEWS.md (which only makes sense if you keep this up-to-date in the future). Please consider everything as a proposal only and let me know if I should add, modify, or undo anything!
Thanks in advance for your consideration!
P.S.: R CMD check produces a NOTE (regarding quantile.weights which is misinterpreted as an S3 method) and a WARNING (regarding undocumented objects starting with a period: .binom, .counts, ...). These seem unrelated to my changes, though. Also, they don't appear in the current CRAN release but I didn't dig deeper.
Accompanying the addition of the GAMLSS class based on distributions3 in
gamlss.dist
I have added aprodist()
method forgamlss
objects here. This greatly facilitates the entire workflow as illustrated on the corresponding manual page?prodist.gamlss
.As for
gamlss.dist
I have streamlined theDESCRIPTION
a bit (adding myself as a contributor, and linking to GitHub for bug reports) and added aNEWS.md
(which only makes sense if you keep this up-to-date in the future). Please consider everything as a proposal only and let me know if I should add, modify, or undo anything!Thanks in advance for your consideration!
P.S.:
R CMD check
produces a NOTE (regardingquantile.weights
which is misinterpreted as an S3 method) and a WARNING (regarding undocumented objects starting with a period:.binom
,.counts
, ...). These seem unrelated to my changes, though. Also, they don't appear in the current CRAN release but I didn't dig deeper.