Closed GernotMaier closed 6 years ago
@GernotMaier - OK if I only give this a cursory review and then merge?
I think double-checking the numbers against the paper would take me a lot of time here.
Yes - that is fine. These are all 'obvious' mistakes.
(and I am trying to organise currently a file-by-file review inside VERITAS to cross check all values with the publications)
OK. We can / should also improve the scripts. With ~ 1 day or work we can have validation for a lot of data entry stuff, e.g. units.
I've cross checked 2015ApJ...812...60B with the paper and the factor of 10 correction is needed.
This is the only VERITAS detection with such a problem. I've checked all VERITAS sources and for all the flux points and spectral points agree now.
This pull requests consist of a number of corrections for:
I've cross-checked all existing spectral models and spectra for VERITAS - hope that the worst mistakes are corrected.