search

gammapy / gamma-sky

Portal to the gamma-ray sky
http://gamma-sky.net/
MIT License
6 stars 3 forks source link

Submit Gamma 2016 to ArXiv #56

Open cdeil opened 8 years ago

cdeil commented 8 years ago

@vorugantia - this is a reminder issue to submit the Gamma 2016 to ArXiv, after deploying version 1.0 of gamma-sky.net

Select "LaTeX" version and upload this single file: https://github.com/gammapy/gammaskynet-gamma2016/blob/master/proceeding/gammaskynet-gamma2016.tar.gz

We can use this issue to discuss if there are any questions or problems.

cdeil commented 7 years ago

@adonath and I just now found out that the gamma-sky.net proceeding is online and not behind a paywall: http://aip.scitation.org/doi/pdf/10.1063/1.4969002

Apparently it's not included in ADS yet, but presumably this will automatically happen in the coming weeks: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#search/fq=%7B!type%3Daqp%20v%3D%24fq_author%7D&fq_author=(author_facet_hier%3A%220%2FDeil%2C%20C%22)&q=deil&sort=date%20desc%2C%20bibcode%20desc

I don't think posting it on ArXiv now is useful. That is a preprint server that is mostly for things that aren't published yet or are behind a paywall. In this case it's published and freely available.

@adonath @vorugantia - Agreed or do you see a point in posting to ArXiv?

@vorugantia - Can you update the docs to mention this paper very prominently at the top? I will try to review our docs and put "please cite us in this way if you've used gamma-sky.net" in the coming days, but for now just mentioning the paper is good enough, and then this issue can be closed.

vorugantia commented 7 years ago

I agree that we don't need to post to ArXiv anymore. I'll update the docs now.

cdeil commented 7 years ago

Thanks! Closing this issue now.

cdeil commented 7 years ago

I'm re-opening this issue.

So what happened is that AIP gave free access for a month, but from now on (indefinitely?) the PDF is behind a paywall. Frank suggested we post on ArXiv, and we should do that.

@vorugantia - I would still suggest we work on the webpage a bit more. To be concrete, I think we should have this in place when we post on ArXiv (that's going to be the day when most astronomers look at it):

There's many other things (more catalogs, more images, links between source detail views an map view, ...) that can come later, but there should be a nice core page in place.

cdeil commented 7 years ago

It's here now: https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.04217

Since the journal proceeding is still behind a paywall, I would suggest to change all links from the webpage / wiki docs to the arxiv version, which is open access and anyone can see it quickly. (or put both).

@vorugantia - Can you please do it?